Field v. Clark

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Court Documents
Dissenting Opinion
Lamar

United States Supreme Court

143 U.S. 649

Field  v.  Clark

BOYD et al.

v. UNITED STATES et al.

No. 1,049. STERNBACH et al.

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 1,050.

February 29, 1892.

[Syllabus from pages 649-650 intentionally omitted]

N. W. Bliss and John P. Wilson, for Marshall Field & Co., (No. 1,052.)

[Argument of Counsel from pages 651-656 intentionally omitted]

Chas. Curie and W. Wickham Smith, for Boyd et al., (No. 1,049.)

[Argument of Counsel from pages 656-659 intentionally omitted]

S. G. Clarke and E. B. Smith, for Sternbach et al., (No. 1,050.)

[Argument of Counsel from pages 659-661 intentionally omitted]

Atty. Gen. Miller and Sol. Gen. Taft, for United States Collector in all the cases.

Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).