Flood v. Kuhn/Concurrence Burger

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Flood v. Kuhn (1972)
Concurrence Burger by Warren Burger
4602396Flood v. Kuhn — Concurrence Burger1972Warren Burger
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Burger
Dissenting Opinions
Douglas
Marshall

[p285] MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER, concurring.


I concur in all but Part I of the Court's opinion but, like MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, I have grave reservations [p286] as to the correctness of Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356 (1953); as he notes in his dissent, he joined that holding but has "lived to regret it." The error, if such it be, is one on which the affairs of a great many people have rested for a long time. Courts are not the forum in which this tangled web ought to be unsnarled. I agree with MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS that congressional inaction is not a solid base, but the least undesirable course now is to let the matter rest with Congress; it is time the Congress acted to solve this problem.