Frank v. Maryland/Concurrence Whittaker

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
916619Frank v. Maryland — ConcurrenceCharles Evans Whittaker
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Whittaker
Dissenting Opinion
Douglas
 Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

359 U.S. 360

Frank  v.  Maryland

 Argued: March 5, 1959. --- Decided: May 4, 1959


Mr. Justice WHITTAKER, concurring.

The core of the Fourth Amendment prohibiting unreasonable searches applies to the States through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25, 69 S.Ct. 1359, 93 L.Ed. 1782. I understand the Court's opinion to adhere fully to that principle. And being convinced that the health inspector's request for permission to enter petitioner's premises in midday for the sole purpose of attempting to locate the habitat of disease-carrying rodents known to be somewhere in the immediate area was not a request for permission to make, and that the Code procedures followed did not amount to enforcement of, an unreasonable search within the meaning of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, I join the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom The CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice BRENNAN concur, dissenting.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse