Giaccio v. Pennsylvania/Concurrence Stewart

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
928170Giaccio v. Pennsylvania — ConcurrencePotter Stewart
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinions
Stewart
Fortas

United States Supreme Court

382 U.S. 399

Giaccio  v.  Pennsylvania

 Argued: Dec. 6, 1965. --- Decided: Jan 19, 1966


Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring.

I concur in the Court's determination that the Pennsylvania statute here in question cannot be squared with the standards of the Fourteenth Amendment, but for reasons somewhat different from those upon which the Court relies. It seems to me that, despite the Court's disclaimer, much of the reasoning in its opinion serves to cast grave constitutional doubt upon the settled practice of many States to leave to the unguided discretion of a jury the nature and degree of punishment to be imposed upon a person convicted of a criminal offense. Though I have serious questions about the wisdom of that practice, its constitutionality is quite a different matter. In the present case it is enough for me that Pennsylvania allows a jury to punish a defendant after finding him not guilty. That, I think, violates the most rudimentary concept of due process of law.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse