Glycols (5523)

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (1994)
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Glycols (5523)
2003006NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods — Glycols (5523)1994National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

GLYCOLS

FORMULA: Table 1

5523

MW: Table 1

METHOD: 5523, Issue 1

CAS: Table 1

EVALUATION: PARTIAL

OSHA : No PEL NIOSH: No REL ACGIH: C 50 ppm (ethylene glycol) (1 ppm = 2.54 mg/m3 @ NTP)

NAMES & SYNONYMS:

PROPERTIES:

(1) ethylene glycol: 1,2-ethanediol; (3) 1,3-butylene glycol: 1,3-butanediol

XAD-7 OVS tube (glass fiber filter, 13-mm; XAD-7, 200mg/100mg)

Issue 1: 15 May 1996

See Table 1

(2) propylene glycol: 1,2-propanediol (4) diethylene glycol: 2-hydroxyethyl ether, 2,2'oxydiethanol

SAMPLING SAMPLER:

RTECS: Table 1

MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUE:

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY, FID

ANALYTES:

compounds above

DESORPTION:

2 mL methanol; ultrasonicate 30 min

INJECTION VOLUME:

1 µL

FLOW RATE: 0.5 to 2 L/min VOL-MIN: 5L -MAX: 60 L SHIPMENT: SAMPLE STABILITY:

pack cold for shipment

28 days @ 5 C [1] ethylene glycol 14 days @ 5 C [1]

TEMPERATURE-INJECTION: -DETECTOR: -COLUMN:

250 C 300 C 40 C, 8 C/min to 230 C

CARRIER GAS:

He2 @ 2.4 to 2.6 mL/min

COLUMN:

Rtx-35 fused silica capillary, 30 m, 0.53-mm ID, 3-µm film

CALIBRATION:

solutions of glycols in methanol

RANGE STUDIED: see EVALUATION OF METHOD

RANGE:

15 to 800 µg/sample

BIAS:

ESTIMATED LOD: see Table 2

BLANKS:

2 to 10 field blanks per set ACCURACY

see EVALUATION OF METHOD

OVERALL PRECISION ( ACCURACY:

rT

): not determined

PRECISION ( r):

0.04 to 0.09 [1]

not determined

APPLICABILITY: Under the GC parameters given in the method, the glycols listed above are baseline separated and can be identified based on retention time and quantified. Hexylene glycol can be determined by this method; however, no sampling or analytical evaluation has been conducted. INTERFERENCES:No specific interferences were identified. The method yields baseline separation for all analytes. OTHER METHODS: This method replaces NMAM 5500 [2], which was found deficient in the collection of ethylene glycol in aerosol form. Also ethylene glycol was not separated from propylene glycol by the chromatography.

NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition GLYCOLS: METHOD 5523, Issue 1, dated 15 May 1996 - Page 2 of 5 REAGENTS:

EQUIPMENT:

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

1. Sampler: XAD-7 OVS tube, 13-mm OD, containing two sections of XAD-7 (200 mg front/100 mg back section) separated by polyurethane foam plug. A glass fiber filter plug precedes the front section and a polyurethane foam plug follows the back section. Tubes are commercially available (SKC, Inc., #226-57). 2. Personal sampling pump, 0.5 to 2 mL/min, with flexible connecting tubing. 3. Gas chromatograph, flame ionization detector, integrator, and column (page 5523-1). 4. Ultrasonic bath. 5. Vials, autosampler, with PTFE-lined caps. 6. Vials, 4 mL, with screw caps. 7. Syringes, 10-µL and other sizes as needed, readable to 0.1 µL. 8. Flasks, volumetric, various sizes. 9. Pipets, various sizes.

Ethylene glycol, reagent grade.* Propylene glycol, reagent grade.* 1,3-Butylene glycol, reagent grade.* Diethylene glycol, reagent grade.* Triethylene glycol, reagent grade.* Tetraethylene glycol, reagent grade.* Methanol, chromatographic grade.* Calibration stock solution, 10 mg/mL: Weigh aliquots of each glycol and dissolve in methanol. 9. Helium, purified. 10. Hydrogen, prepurified. 11. Air, filtered.

  • See SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS

SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS: Inhalation of glycol mists causes respiratory irritation, shortness of breath, and coughing. Methanol is flammable and a dangerous fire risk. Work with these compounds in a wellventilated hood. SAMPLING: 1. Calibrate each personal sampling pump with a representative sampler in line. 2. Remove front and rear caps from the tube immediately before sampling. Attach sampler to personal sampling pump with flexible tubing. 3. Sample at an accurately known flow rate between 0.5 and 2 L/min for a total sample size of 5 to 60 L. 4. Cap the samplers and pack securely in dry ice for shipment.

SAMPLE PREPARATION: 5. Place front sorbent section and glass fiber filter in a 4-mL screw cap vial. Place backup sorbent section in a separate vial. Discard foam plugs. 6. Add 2 mL of methanol to each vial and cap. 7. Place vials in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min to aid desorption.

CALIBRATION AND QUALITY CONTROL: 8. Calibrate daily with at least six working standards over the range of interest. Three standards (in duplicate) should cover the range from LOD to LOQ. a. Add known amounts of calibration stock solution to methanol in 10-mL volumetric flasks and dilute to the mark. b. Analyze together with samples and blanks (steps 11 and 12). c. Prepare calibration graph (peak area or height vs. µg glycol). 9. Determine desorption efficiency(DE) at least once for each lot of OVS tubes used for sampling in the calibration range (step 8). a. Prepare three samplers at each of six levels plus three media blanks. b. Inject a known amount of calibration stock solution directly onto the filter of OVS tubes. Draw air NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition GLYCOLS: METHOD 5523, Issue 1, dated 15 May 1996 - Page 3 of 5

c. d. e. 10.

through the sampler at 1 L/min for 60 min. Cap the ends of the tubes and allow to stand overnight. Desorb (steps 5 through 7) and analyze together with standards and blanks (steps 11 and 12). Prepare a graph of DE vs. µg analyte recovered. Analyze three quality control blind spikes and three analyst spikes to ensure that the calibration graph and DE graphs are in control.

MEASUREMENT: 11.

Set gas chromatograph according to manufacturer’s recommendations and to conditions given on page 5523-1. Inject 1-µL sample aliquot manually using solvent flush technique or with autosampler. NOTE: If peak area is above the linear range of the working standards, dilute with methanol, reanalyze and apply the appropriate dilution factor in the calculations. 12. Measure peak areas.

CALCULATIONS: 13.

14.

Determine the mass, µg (corrected for DE), of each glycol found in the sample front (W f) and back (Wb) sorbent sections, and in the average media blank front (B f) and back (Bb) sorbent sections. NOTE: If Wb > Wf /10, report breakthrough and possible sample loss. Calculate concentration, C, of each analyte in the air volume sampled, V (L):

C

(Wf Wb Bf Bb) V

,mg/m 3

EVALUATION OF METHOD: The method was evaluated for six glycols (ethylene, propylene, 1,3-butylene, diethylene, triethylene, and tetraethylene). Desorption efficiency (DE) was determined by spiking known amounts of each glycol in methanol solution onto the glass fiber filter plug of the XAD-7 OVS tubes, drawing air through the spiked tubes at 1 L/min for 60 min, and analyzing. Recovery data along with LODs and LOQs for each analyte are listed in Table 2. When stored at 5 C, ethylene glycol samples on XAD-7 OVS tubes were stable for 14 days, and the other glycols were stable up to 28 days. Glycol aerosols were generated at three concentration levels (6 samples per concentration) from a ROSCO™ Model 1500 Fog Machine. Precision [as calculated from the pooled relative standard deviation ( r)] and mean bias for the glycols are as follows: Analyte Ethylene glycol Propylene glycol 1,3-butylene glycol Diethylene glycol Triethylene glycol Tetraethylene glycol (2 levels)

Range Studied (µg/sample) 33 to 218 26 to 187 34 to 178 68 to 219 33 to 201 32 to 197

Precision ( r) 0.043 0.062 0.054 0.047 0.075 0.035

Bias -15% -3.2% -0.5% -0.2% -4.0% +20%

The low recovery for ethylene glycol possibly may be attributed to increased volitility when sampled at 1 L/min [1]. Although hexylene glycol is separated by the chromatographic conditions given in the method, no evaluation of sampling or analytical parameters was done for this compound. REFERENCES: [1]

Pendergrass, S.M. [1994].

Development of a sampling and analytical methodology for the

NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition GLYCOLS: METHOD 5523, Issue 1, dated 15 May 1996 - Page 4 of 5

[2]

determination of glycols in air: Application to theatrical smokes. Unpublished paper presented at Pittsburgh Conference, Chicago, IL, March 1994. NIOSH [1984]. Ethylene glycol: Method 5500. In: Eller PM, Ed. NIOSH manual of analytical methods, 3rd ed. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, HHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 84-100.

METHOD WRITTEN BY: Stephanie M. Pendergrass, MRSB, DPSE

TABLE 1. GLYCOLS GENERAL INFORMATION Analyte

Formula

MW

CAS #

RTECS #

Properties

Ethylene glycol

C2H6O2

62.07

107-21-1

KW2975000

liquid; BP 197.2 C; FP -13 C; d 1.113 g/mL @ 20 C; nD 1.4310; vp 0.007 kPa (0.05 mm Hg) @ 20 C; explosive limits 3.2 to 15.3% v/v in air

Propylene glycol

C3H8O2

76.10

57-55-6

TY2000000

liquid; BP 188 C; FP -60 C ; d 1.038 g/mL @ 20 C; nD 1.4320; vp 0.009 kPa (0.07 mm Hg) @ 20 C; explosive limits 2.6 to 12.5% v/v in air

1,3-Butylene glycol

C4H10O2

90.12

107-88-0

EK0440000

liquid; BP 207.5 C; d 1.0059 g/mL @ 20 C; nD 1.4400; vp 0.06 mm Hg @ 20 C

Diethylene glycol

C4H10O3

106.12

111-46-6

ID5950000

liquid; BP 245 C; FP -6.5 C; d 1.118 g/mL @ 20 C; nD 1.4460 @ 25 C; vp <0.01 mm Hg @ 20 C; explosive limits 3 to 7% v/v in air

Triethylene glycol

C6H14O4

150.17

112-27-6

YE4550000

liquid; BP 285 C; FP -5 C; d 1.125 g/mL @ 20 C; nD 1.4550; vp <0.001 mm Hg @ 20 C; explosive limits 0.9 to 9.2% v/v in air

Tetraethylene glycol

C8H18O5

194.23

112-60-7

XC2100000

liquid; BP 327.3 C; FP -4 C; d 1.125 g/mL @ 20 C; nD 1.4577; vp >0.001 mm Hg @ 20 C

NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition GLYCOLS: METHOD 5523, Issue 1, dated 15 May 1996 - Page 5 of 5 TABLE 2. GLYCOL RECOVERY DATA Desorption Efficiency Spikesa Analyte

a b

b r

LOD (µg/sample)

LOQ (µg/sample )

100 µg (% Recovery)

200 µg (% Recovery)

Ethylene glycol

7

22

93.4

101

0.059

Propylene glycol

6

13

83.4

92.5

0.064

1,3-Butylene glycol

6

12

98.8

102

0.072

Diethylene glycol

16

48

94.6

114

0.041

Triethylene glycol

14

42

85.3

98.7

0.043

Tetraethylene glycol

14

42

111

141

0.092

n = 6 for each spiking level Pooled Relative Standard Deviation

NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition