Hariton v. Arco Electronics, Inc.

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hariton v. Arco Electronics, Inc.
by the Delaware Court of Chancery
Syllabus

Court Documents
Opinion of the Court

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle

40 Del. Ch. 326; 182 A.2d 22

MARTIN HARITON, Plaintiff,  v.  ARCO ELECTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant

Irving Morris and Joseph A. Rosenthal, of Cohen & Morris, Wilmington, for plaintiff.

Samuel S. Arsht and Walter K. Stapleton, of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, for defendant.

SHORT, Vice Chancellor.

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).


OOjs UI icon alert destructive black-darkred.svg A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.