Hurd v. Hodge Urciolo

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Hurd v. Hodge Urciolo
by Fred M. Vinson
Syllabus
903248Hurd v. Hodge Urciolo — SyllabusFred M. Vinson
Court Documents
Concurring Opinion
Frankfurter

United States Supreme Court

334 U.S. 24

Hurd  v.  Hodge Urciolo

 Argued: Jan. 15, 16, 1948. --- Decided: May 3, 1948

Messrs. Charles H. Houston and Phineas Indritz, both of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.

Messrs. Henry Gilligan and James A. Crooks, both of Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Mr. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of court.

[Argument of Counsel from page 25 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Chief Justice VINSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse