Jones v. Green

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Jones v. Green
by Stephen Johnson Field
Syllabus
713154Jones v. Green — SyllabusStephen Johnson Field
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

68 U.S. 330

Jones  v.  Green

APPEAL from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Nebraska, the case being thus:

In February, 1859, C. and J. Green and C. and I. Gill filed a bill in Chancery in the District Court of the Territory just mentioned, against one Jones and a certain Brown. It set forth that in March, 1858, the said Greens had obtained judgment in the District Court of the First Judicial District of Nebraska, against Brown, for $1155, and that in October of the same year, the other two complainants, G. and C. Gill, had obtained judgment against him in the same court for $450. It charged, that on the 15th of July, 1857, Brown was engaged in mercantile pursuits in the city of Omaha; that he was on that day utterly insolvent, and being about to suspend business and the payment of his debts, purchased certain real estate in the city just named; and in order to place it beyond the reach of his creditors, procured a conveyance to be made to the other defendant, Jones, who it was alleged now held the property upon a secret trust for him. The bill set forth also that executions had been issued and returned unsatisfied, and prayed that the premises might be sold and the proceeds applied to the payment of the judgments. The answer denied that executions had been issued and returned unsatisfied; and there was no sufficient proof that they had been.

The District Court rendered a decree in favor of the complainants, and the Supreme Court of the Territory affirmed it. On the argument of the appeal in this court,-which was by Messrs. Carlisle and Redick for the appellant, and by Mr. Woolworth contra,-several objections were made to the decree; but the only one considered by the court was, whether the bill would lie before the judgment creditors had attempted to collect their judgments by execution at law.

Mr. Justice FIELD delivered the opinion of the court:

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse