Louisville Nashville Railroad Company v. Scott/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
846432Louisville Nashville Railroad Company v. Scott — Opinion of the CourtHorace Harmon Lurton

United States Supreme Court

219 U.S. 209

Louisville Nashville Railroad Company  v.  Scott

 Argued: October 19, 20, 1910. ---


This case was heard with No. 215, Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Riverside Mills, just decided. [[[219 U.S. 186]], 55 L. ed. --, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 164.] Like that case it presents only the question of the constitutionality of the Carmack amendment of the act to regulate commerce.

The facts are not substantially different, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the Commonwealth of Kentucky is affirmed upon the authority of that case.

Affirmed.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse