McDermott, Inc. v. Lewis

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
McDermott, Inc. v. Lewis
by the Delaware Supreme Court
Syllabus

Court Documents
Opinion of the Court

Supreme Court of Delaware

531 A.2d 206

McDermott Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant Below, Appellant,  v.  Harry Lewis and Nina Altman, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees

No. 261  Argued: December 9, 1986 --- Decided: September 16, 1987

Charles F. Richards, Jr., Esquire, of Richards, Layton & Finger; Wilmington, Richard F. Nolan, Esquire (argued), and Dennis E. Glazer, Esquire, of Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York, of Counsel, for Appellant.

Norman M. Monhait, Esquire, of Morris & Rosenthal; Wilmington, Mordecai Rosenfeld, Esquire (argued), of Mordecai Rosenfeld, P.C., New York, and A. Arnold Gershon, Esquire, of A. Arnold Gershon, P.C., New York, Of Counsel, for Appellees.

Christie, Chief Justice, Horsey and Moore, Justices.

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).


OOjs UI icon alert destructive black-darkred.svg A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.