Page:AIM-443.djvu/1

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LABORATORY

AI Memo 443
October 1977

DEBUNKING THE "EXPENSIVE PROCEDURE CALL" MYTH

or, PROCEDURE CALL IMPLEMENTATIONS CONSIDERED HARMFUL

or, LAMBDA: THE ULTIMATE GOTO

by

Guy Lewis Steele Jr.[1]

Abstract:

Folklore states that GOTO statements are "cheap", while procedure calls are "expensive". This myth is largely a result of poorly designed language implementations. The historical growth of this myth is considered. Both theoretical ideas and an existing implementation are discussed which debunk this myth. It is shown that the unrestricted use of procedure calls permits great stylistic freedom. In particular, any flowchart can be written as a "structured" program without introducing extra variables. The difficulty with the GOTO statement and the procedure call is characterized as a conflict between abstract programming concepts and concrete language constructs.

This is an annotated version of a paper to be presented at the ACM National Conference (ACM '77), Seattle, Washington, October 1977.

Keywords: procedure calls, subroutine calls, structured programming, programming style, compilers, optimization

This report describes research done at the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Support for the laboratory's artificial intelligence research is provided in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense under Office of Naval Research contract N00014-75-C-0643.


  1. NSF Fellow