ask them for their consent to the change of purpose, than to throw away the money for a purpose which cannot be accomplished.
In reply to your inquiry whether any bill has been brought before Congress providing for the settlement of the Indians in severalty, and for conferring upon the individual title in fee-simple to the lands allotted to them, I am glad to say that several bills of this kind have been introduced in both the Senate and the House, and are now before the respective committees on Indian affairs for consideration. If such a bill passes, of which there is great hope, the Indian, having a fee title by patent to the piece of land which he individually, not as a member of a tribe, holds as his own, will stand in the eye of the law just like any other owner of property in his individual right, and, as a matter of course, will have the same standing in court. This will do more in securing the Indian in the practical enjoyment of his property than anything else I can think of, and it has long been my endeavor to bring about just this result. I trust we shall obtain the desired legislation during the present session of Congress.
Mrs. Helen Jackson, New York.
The evasive and inconclusive character of these replies of the
Secretary provoked much comment, and gave rise to a very
widespread and natural impression that he was for some reason or
other averse to the restoration to the Poncas of their old homes.
The letters were reviewed by one of the editors of the New York
Times in a paper so admirable that the letters ought not to be
printed without it.
CIVIL RIGHTS IN ACRES.
(From The New York Times, February 21st, 1880.)
“As most of the readers of The Times already know, friends of the Ponca Indians are endeavoring to have the tribe restored to their old reservation in Dakota. Or, more strictly speaking, it is proposed that their reservation shall be restored to them. The lands occupied by the Poncas were ceded to them by the United States by solemn treaty. By a cruel and wicked blunder, which no man has attempted to explain, those lands were ceded to the Sioux. But the Sioux did not want the lands, and they have never occupied them unto this day. To this robbery of the tribe was added the destruction of their houses, movable property, and farms. A citizen of the United States would have redress in the
