Page:A Collection of Esoteric Writings.djvu/277

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

263

The number seven is at the very root of occult Cosmogony and Anthropogony. No symbol to express evolution from its starting to its completion points would be possible without it. For the circle produces the point; the point expands into a triangle, returning after two angles upon itself, and then forms the mystical Tetraktis—the plane cube; which three when passing into the manifested world of effects, differentiated nature, become geometrically and numerically 3+4=7. The best Kabbalists have been demonstrating this for ages ever since Pythagoras, and down to the modern mathematicians and symbologists, one of whom has succeeded in wrenching for ever one of the seven occult keys, and has proved his victory by a volume of figures. Set any of our theosophiats interested in the question to read the wonderful work called "The Hebrew Egyptian Mystery, the Source of Measures;" and those of them who are good mathematicians will remain aghast before the revelations contained in it. For it shows indeed that occult source of the measure by which were built kosmos and man, and then by the latter the great Pyramid of Egypt, as all the towers, mounds, obelisks, eave-temples of India, and pyramids in Peru and Mexico, and all the archaic monuments; symbols in stone of Chaldæa, both Americas, and even of the Eastern Islands—the living and solitary witness of a submerged prehistoric continent in the midst of the Pacific Ocean. It shows that the same figures and measures for the same esoteric symbology existed throughout the world; it shows in the words of the author that the Kabbala is a "whole series of developments based upon the use of geometrical elements; giving expression in numerical values, founded on integral values of the circle" (one of the seven keys hitherto known but to the Initiates), discovered by Peter Metius in the 16th century, and re-discovered by the late John A. Parker.*[1] Moreover, that the system from whence all these developments were derived "was anciently considered to be one resting in


  1. * Of Newark, in his work The Quadrature of the Circle, his "problem of the three revolving bodies"—(N. Y., John Wiley & Son.)