Page:A Dictionary of Music and Musicians vol 3.djvu/589

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
This page needs to be proofread.


effect of being out of the direct line of their natural mode of expression. In Chopin, for in- stance, the characteristic qualities of modern music, in the treatment of ideas in short and malleable forms specially adapted to their ex- pression, are found abundantly, and in these his genuine qualities are most clearly displayed. His sonatas are less successful, and less familiar to musicians ; because, though quite master enough to deal with structure clearly and definitely, it was almost impossible for him to force the ideas within the limits which should make that struc- ture relevant and convincing. They are children of a fervid and impetuous genius, and the clas- sical dress and manners do not sit easily upon them. Moreover the luxuriant fancy, the rich- ness and high colour of expression, the sensuous qualities of the harmony, all tend to emphasise detail in a new and peculiar manner, and to make the sonata-principle of the old order appear irrelevant. The most successful are the Sonatas in Bb minor for pianoforte, op. 35, and that for pianoforte and cello in G minor, op. 65. In both these cases the first movements, which are gener- ally a sure test of a capacity for sonata-writing, are clearly disposed, and free from superfluous wandering and from tautology. There are cer- tain idiosyncrasies in the treatment of the form, as for instance in the recapitulation, which in both cases is almost limited to the materials of the second section, the opening features of the movement being only hinted at in conclusion. The subjects themselves are fairly appropriate to the style of movement, and are kept well in hand, so that on the whole, in these two cases, the impression conveyed is consistent with the sonata-character. In scherzos Chopin was thoroughly at home, and moreover they repre- sent a province in which far more abandonment is admissible. In both sonatas they are suc- cessful, but that in the Pianoforte Sonata is especially fascinating and characteristic, and though the modulations are sometimes rather reckless the main divisions are well propor- tioned, and consequently the general effect of the outlines is sufficiently clear. The slow move- ments of both are very well known; that of the Pianoforte Sonata being the Funeral March, and the other being a kind of romance in Chopin's own free manner, which is familiar to players on the cello. The last movement of the Piano- forte Sonata is a short but characteristic out- break of whirling notes, in general character not unlike some of his Preludes, and equally free and original in point of form, but in that respect not without precedent among the last movements of early masters. In the mind of the composer it possibly had a poetical connection with the Funeral March. The other last movement is a free kind of rondo, and therefore more consonant with the ordinary principles of form, and is appro- priate, without being so interesting as the other movements. The total effect of these sonatas is naturally of an entirely different order from that of the earlier types, and not so convincing in oneness as the works of great masters of this kind

VOL. III. FT. 5.



��of form; they are nevertheless plausible as wholes, and in details most effective ; the balance and ap- propriate treatment of the two instruments in the op. 65 being especially noteworthy. The other sonatas for pianoforte, in C minor and B minor, are more unequal. The first appears to be an early work, and contains some remarkable ex- periments, one of which at least has value, others probably not. As examples may be men- tioned the use of 5-4 time throughout the slow movement, and the experiment of beginning the recapitulation of the first movement in Bb minor, when the principal key is C minor. In this sonata he seems not to move with sufficient ease, and in the B minor, op. 58, with something too much to have the general aspect of a successful work of the kind. The technical devices in the latter as in the others are extremely elaborate and effective, without being offensively obtrusive, and theddeas are often clear and fascinating ; but as a complete and convincing work it is hardly successful.

Sonatas which followed implicitly the old lines without doing more than formulate sub- jects according to supposed laws do not require any notice. The mere artificial reproduction of forms that have been consciously realised from observation of great works of the past without importing anything original into the treatment, is often the most hopeless kind of plagiarism, and far more deliberate than the accidents of coincidence in ideas which are obvious to super- ficial observers.

As examples of independent thought working in a comparatively untried field, Mendelssohn's six sonatas for the organ have some import- ance. They have very little connection with the Pianoforte Sonata, or the history of its develop- ment; for Mendelssohn seems to have divined that the binary and similar instrumental forms of large scope were unsuitable to the genius of the instrument, and returned to structural prin- ciples of a date before those forms had become prominent or definite. Their chief connection with the modern sonata type lies in the distri- bution of the keys in which the respective move- ments stand, and the broad contrasts in time and character which subsist between one division or movement and another. Different members of the group represent different methods of dealing with the problem. In the large movements fugal and contrapuntal principles predominate, some- times alternating with passages of a decidedly harmonic character. In movements which are not absolute fugues the broad outlines of form are commonly similar to those already described as exemplified in Bach's Sonatas, and in the first and last movements of his 'Concerto dans le style Italien.' This form in its broadest signi- ficance amounts to a correspondence of well- defined sections at the beginning and end, with a long passage of 'free fantasia,' sometimes fugally developed, in the middle. The clearest example in these sonatas is the first movement of the 3rd Sonata, in A major, in which the correspond- ing divisions at either end are long, and strongly

�� �