Page:A General Survey of the History of the Canon of the New Testament (7th edition, 1896).djvu/89

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
I.]
THE AGE OF THE APOSTOLIC FATHERS.
21
Chap. i.

shew that the writings of the Apostles were regarded from the first as invested with singular authority, as the true expression, if not the original source, of Christian doctrine and Christian practice. And more than this: indirect,they prove that it is unnecessary to have recourse to later influences to explain the existence of peculiar forms of Christianity which were coeval with its reception in the world. In a word, they mark the beginnings of a written Canon, and establish the permanence of the elements of the Catholic faith.

in their preservation of the Apostolic types of doctrineThe latter point must be examined with care; for it is very needful to notice the proofs of the continuity of the representative forms of Christian doctrine at a time when it has been supposed to have undergone strange changes. Many have rightly perceived that the reception of the Canon implies the existence of one Catholic Church; and conversely, if we can shew that the distinct constituents of Catholicity were found in Christendom from the first age, we confirm the authenticity of those books which severally suggest and sanction them. though often in an exaggerated form.It is true that these different types of teaching are at times arbitrarily expanded in the uncanonical writings without any regard to their relative importance, but still they are essentially unchanged; and by the help of patristic deductions we may see in what way the natural tendencies which give rise to opposing heresies are always intrinsically recognised in the teaching of the universal Church. The elements of Holy Scripture are so tempered that though truly distinct they combine harmoniously; elsewhere the same elements are disproportionately developed, and in the end mutually exclude each other[1].

  1. In studying the writings of the early Fathers much help may be gained from the following works (in addition to the Church histories), by which I have sought to try and to correct my own views: Rothe (R.) Die Anfänge d. Christlichen Kirche...1837. Möhler (J. A.) Patrologie, Regensburg, 1840. Schliemann (A.) Die Clementinen, Hamburg, 1844. Dorner (J. A.) Die Lehre von der Person Christi, Stuttgart, 1845—53. Schwegler (A.) Das nachapostolische Zeitalter, Tübingen, 1846. Lechler (G. V.) Das apostolische und nachapostolische Zeitalter, Haarlem, 1851, 2te Aufl. 1857. Ritschl, Die Entstehung der alt-Katholischen Kirche, 2te Aufl., Bonn, 1857. Hilgenfeld (A.) Die apostolischen Väter, Halle, 1853. Reuss (E.) Histoire de la Théologie Chrétienne au Siècle Apostolique, 2me Éd. 1860. Lange (J. P.) Das apostolische Zeitalter... 1854. Donaldson (J.) A Critical History of Christian Literature and Doctrine... Vol. 1. 1865. Lightfoot (Bp.) Ignatius, 1885.