the tenth class from those of the other nine classes, and to treat of them under the head of derivative verbal bases. Most scholars will, I hope, approve of this change. Nor will they, I trust, object to the introduction of the subjunctive mood in § 218. That the terms Radical Aorist and S-Aorist will be generally approved of, I feel less assured, and I shall be ready to give up the S-Aorist for any better or more scientific term that may be suggested to me.*[1] To introduce into a Sanskrit grammar the expressions First and Second Aorist at a time when the best Greek grammars try to get rid of them, appears to me little advisable; and I cannot see the appropriateness of the terms Simple and Compound Aorist when it is far from certain that the letter s, which is employed in the formation of the four last varieties of the Aorist, is really the remainder of the root as 'to be.'
- ↑ * In the present edition the term Sibilant-Aorist has boon adopted from Professor Whitney's Grammar.
