Page:A History of Banking in the United States.djvu/377

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
COURSE OF THE CRISIS; 1840-41.
355

The President reiterated the recommendation of the Exchequer in his message of 1842; but it was defeated in the House, January 27, 1843, by a vote of 193 to 18. It is remarkable how completely dead the whole subject of a national bank had then fallen.

In January, 1842, it was said that the Pennsylvania relief notes had produced a depreciation of the whole circulation, and that it would have been greater but that it had not been found possible to issue as much as the measure contemplated.[1]

The Bank of the Northern Liberties refused the notes of the Girard Bank, January 27, 1842. This produced a run on the latter to which it speedily succumbed. The Bank of Pennsylvania was the fiscal agent of the State. The Treasurer had accumulated in it, in anticipation of the payment of interest to be made on the State debt, February 1st, the sum of $788,000; chiefly in checks and notes on the Girard. The Pennsylvania thus became possessed of so many of the latter, that it paid them out; expecting to pay the interest with its own. It was subjected to a run on the 27th. In three days it paid $406,086 of its deposits and $60,692 of its notes. It then posted a notice that an injunction was expected upon the application of the Governor. Such an injunction was issued. Four other Philadelphia banks failed at this time.

These events produced a panic. No one knew what money was. Some paid their debts with their money in haste before it should be good for nothing. Those who were not in debt lent it to their friends. There was a run, not for specie, "for none was visible, but what seems ludicrous, a run to exchange one bit of paper for another bit of paper."[2]

The "Commercial List" of Philadelphia could not quote bank notes and specie and exchange after the failure of the Pennsylvania and Girard, on account of the confusion. Specie was at ten per cent. premium, exchange on New York seven and a-half. The New York "Price Current" of the same day showed no material variation in that market from the previous rates, except for Pennsylvania, West Jersey, and Ohio notes.[3]

The interest on the Pennsylvania debt was paid by the Bank of Pennsylvania with a nominal advance of four and a-half per cent. but in notes which were eight per cent. below specie.

A Committee of Investigation of the stockholders of the Girard Bank found that the assets, which amounted nominally to $5.6 millions, were worth $756,771.

Upon the failure of these banks, the Legislature once more took the matter of banks and resumption in hand and passed an act, March 12th, ordering the banks to resume immediately, with a proviso that the relief notes should be received by the State but not by the banks. The relief banks fell back on the bargain in the relief bill, and the others said that they had no official notice of the passage of the act. The relief notes fell at once,

  1. Gouge; Journal of Banking, 211.
  2. Gouge; Journal of Banking, 247.
  3. Ibid, 248.