xcviii
diagnostic test of metals was well understood (p. 68). The metallurgical processes, described under the latter, leave little to improve upon (p. 88), and, indeed, they may be transferred bodily to any treatise on modern chemistry. Even Paracelsus, who flourished some three centuries later, leaves us in the dark as to the nature of his 'zinken,' which he designates a 'semi' or 'bastard' metal. And Libavius (d. 1616) "who stood up manfully against the excesses of Paracelsus, and who vigourously combated the defects in his doctrines, * * * and the employment of "secret remedies," believed in the transmutation of the metals and the efficacy of potable gold.[1] It is not necessary to pursue this subject further here, as details will be found in the chapter on metallurgy (pp. 152-169).
The truth is that up till the time to pseudo-Basil Valentine (ca. 1600 A. D.),
- ↑ Gesech. d. chem. I. 13.
