SIR WILLIAM LOCKHART.
his papers carefully concealed, with instructions to his heir, to abstain from pub- lishing them till the year 1750 ; but the connexion of his grandson with the rebellion of 1745 rendering their appearance even then inexpedient, they lay unnoticed until, at the request of count Lockhitrt, they were edited by Mr An- thony Anfrere in 1817.
We have only to add, that in private life his character seems to have been exceedingly amiable, and he enjoyed, in a high degree, the respect and affec- tion, notwithstanding the contrariety of their political principles, of the best and wisest public man of his age, Duncan Forbes of Culloden.
LOCKHART, (Sia) WILLIAM, of Lee, an eminent statesman under the Pro- tectorate of Cromwell, was the third son of Sir James Lockhart of Lee, by Mar- tha, daughter of Douglas of Mordingston. He was born in the year 1621, and received the earlier part of his education in Scotland, whence he proceeded to some one of the usual seminaries in Holland. He did not long remain in that country, but after visiting Scotland for a short period, joined the French army as a volunteer, and so far distinguished himself as to attract the attention of the queen mother, who procured for him a pair of colours. 1 He subsequently ac- companied lord William Hamilton to Scotland, and accepted the appointment of lieutenant-colonel in that nobleman's regiment.
In the course of his military duty he was introduced to Charles I., at his sur- render to the Scottish army before Newark. He was on this occasion knighted, and was afterwards employed to negotiate for the safety of the marquis of More- ton. Having joined in the enterprise of the duke of Hamilton, called the En- gagement, he was taken prisoner in the unfortunate action at Preston, and after remaining a year in custody at Newcastle, regained his liberty at the serious cost (at that period) of one thousand pounds. Having attached himself to the house of Hamilton, he necessarily attracted the jealous notice of the rival noble- man, Argyle, and on several occasions subsequent to the arrival of Charles II. in Scotland, suffered, through its influence, a degree of contumely from the king, which roused his haughty spirit to exclaim, that " No king upon earth should use him in that manner." But while he did not conceive that he should suffer the insults of a king with more patience than those of any other man, his private feeling towards the nominal head of the government did not inter- fere with his duty to his country, and his services to the cause he had adopted as the best. He remained an officer in Charles's army, and his regiment was distinguished for its services at the battle of Worcester. The cause of monarchy being now suppressed in both ends of the island, he remained for two years in retirement ; but, weary of keeping in dormancy powers which he was aware might distinguish him in the service of the state, he repaired to London, and was welcomed by the Protector, who never permitted a man of Lockhart's powers to remain unwillingly idle. From which side the advances were made appears not to be known ; it was probably from that of Lockhart This step is the more surprising as he had belonged to that party of the Scottish presby- terians which used to regard monarchy with most respect. On the 18th of May, 1652, he was appointed one of the commissioners for the administration of justice in Scotland, and in 1654, the Protector gave him one of his nieces in marriage, 2 and raised him to the possession of the highest political influence
1 Harding's Biographical Mirror, iii. 54.
- Harding calls the niece Robina Sewster.' Noble thinks the lady whom Lockhart
married was probably a daughter of Desborough, because secretary Thurloe writes to Lock- hart, " H. H. (the Protector) doe very much rejoice to hear that your lady is in a way of recovery, and so doth general Desborough, and truly no more than jours, &c." House of Cromwell, ii. 256.