his critique with such a burst of indignation as the offence of the poet merited.
After acknowledging the high talents of Moore in a few sentences, the reviewer
thus continues: "He is indebted, we fear, for the celebrity he actually enjoys
to accomplishments of a different description ; and may boast, if the boast can
please him, of being the most licentious of modern versifiers, and the most
poetical of those who, in our times, have devoted their talents to the propagation of immorality. We regard his book, indeed, as a public nuisance, and
would willingly trample it down by one short movement of contempt and indignation, had we not reason to apprehend that it was abetted by patrons, who
are entitled to a more respectful remonstrance, and by admirers, who may require
a more extended exposition of their dangers." The article throughout was
judged to be so personal, that the poet resolved to redress himself in another
way than by writing a rejoinder, either in prose or verse. In short, he resolved
to call the critic out, a purpose which he was enabled to effect in consequence
of a visit that Jeffrey made to London a short time after the article was published. The hostile parties met in a field near London, and Jeffrey was attended
on this occasion by his friend Horner. The police, however, had got intelligence
of their purpose, and arrested the combatants when the duel was about to commence. On reaching the police-office the pistols were examined, when it was
found that Jeffrey's contained no bullet, as it had probably dropped out when
the weapon was snatched from him; while that of the poet was furnished with
the usual complement of lead, and ready for execution. A foolish affair in itself,
the meeting was rendered more ridiculous still by the reports that were founded
upon the harmless pistol, both weapons being represented as in the same condition, and fit to produce nothing more than a little noise. The offending parties,
being bound over to keep the peace, resolved to adjourn the combat to the
neutral ground of Hamburg. But better thoughts occurred, and an explanation followed, in which Jeffrey declared that it was the morality of the book,
and not of the man, which he had judged and condemned ; while Moore professed himself satisfied with the explanation. Nothing was more natural than
that two such fiery spirits should pass from the extreme of dislike to that of friendship; and such was the case with Moore and Jeffrey, whose affection for each other continued till the close of life.
We have already seen the misgivings of Jeffrey as to the effect which his literary censorship would produce upon his progress at the bar. In this respect his fears were happily disappointed; for, although his progress was not rapid, it was steadily growing from year to year, accelerated on the whole, rather than retarded, by his office of reviewer. The literary society of Edinburgh, also, was constantly increasing, and among these he was enabled to take an important stand, as the highest and most influential of British critics. Even the death of his amiable wife, which occurred in 1805, and which he felt more deeply than any calamity that ever befell him either before or after, only drove him more keenly into the duties of active life. And these were neither few nor trivial; for, besides his practice, both in the civil and criminal courts, he took an important share in the legal business of the General Assembly, in which he continued a pleader for twenty years. Saving this mournful domestic bereavement, all things went prosperously onward, so that by the commencement of 1807 he thus writes to his brother: "I work at the ’Review’ still, and might make it a source of considerable emolument if I set any value on money. But I am as rich as I want to be, and should be distressed with more, at least if I were to
