Page:A defence of atheism.pdf/16

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
16
A DEFENCE OF ATHEISM.

it would indeed be universal; but it is not. We have ample evidence to the contrary. According to Dr. Livingstone, there are whole tribes or na­tions, civilized, moral, and virtuous; yes, so hon­est that they expose their goods for sale without guard or value set upon them, trusting to the honor of the purchaser to pay its proper price.—Yet these people have not the remotest idea of a God, and he found it impossible to impart it to them. And in all ages of the world, some of the most civilized, the wisest, and the best, were entire unbelievers, only they dared not openly avow it, except at the risk of their lives. Proscription, the torture, and the stake, were found most effi­cient means to seal the lips of heretics; and though the march of progress has broken the infernal ma­chines, and extinguished the fires of the Inquisi­tion, the proscription, and more refined but not less cruel and bitter persecutions of an intolerant and bigoted public opinion, in Protestant coun­tries, as well as in Catholic, on account of belief, are quite enough to prevent men from honestly avowing their true sentiments upon the subject.—Hence there are few possessed of the moral cour­age of a Humboldt.

If the belief in a God were natural, there would be no need to teach it. Children would possess it as well as adults, the layman as the priest, the heathen as much as the missionary. We don't have to teach the general elements of human na­ture,—the five senses, seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and feeling. They are universal; so would religion be were it natural, but it is not. On the contrary, it is an interesting and demon­strable fact, that all children are Atheists, and were religion not inculcated into their minds they would remain so. Even as it is, they are great