Page:A history of Bohemian literature.pdf/161

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

144

A HISTORY OF BOHEMIAN LITERATURE

receiving communion in the two kinds were granted to them. Other Utraquists, who maintained that they alone had preserved the teaching of Hus in its purity, differed from the Church of Rome on other points also, as had been the case with Hus himself. Among the T aborites also a more moderate party, led by Zizka/^and known after his death as the " Orphans/^^'Hisagreed with yet more advanced Church reformers. Finally, it should be mentioned that the intense religious excitement, and the widely spread belief in the approaching millennium, led to the formation of yet more advanced religious sects, against some of which even the Taborites had no hesitation in employing the " secular arm." All these parties found exponents of their views, but it will here be possible to mention only very few of the very many theological controversialists of this time. The principal champion of the moderate Utraquists was Magister John jof_E£ib-ram, who is stated to have been a pupil of Matthew of Janov. His polemical works are all directed against the Taborites, and even against the more advanced members of his own party. His constant adversary was the English Hussite, Peter Payne, known to the Bohemians as " Magister Englis." Pribram endeavoured, not very successfully, to prove that the teaching of Hus was quite independent of that of " the foreigner Wycliffe," and availed himself of the national prejudices of the Bohemians for the purpose of alienating them from the teaching of the English reformer and his pupil, Peter Payne. The most important work of Pribram bears the name Of the great Torment of the Holy Church, and was long attributed to Milic of Kremsier. One of his most noteworthy books also is his Lives of the