Page:A history of the theories of aether and electricity. Whittacker E.T. (1910).pdf/403

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
from Faraday to J. J. Thomson
383

fact, by the law of Raoult, {{Wikimath|(p0-p1/p0, is approximately equal to nv/V; so that the previous equation becomes

.

Neglecting v in comparison with v′, and making use of the equation of state of perfect gases (namely,

.

where T denotes the absolute temperature, and R denotes the constant of the equation of state), we have

,

and therefore

.

Thus in the available energy of one gramme-molecule of a dissolved salt, the term which depends on the concentration is proportional to the logarithm of the concentration; and hence, if in a concentration-cell one gramme-molecule of the salt passes from a high concentration c2, at one electrode to a low concentration c1 at the other electrode, its available energy is thereby diminished by an amount proportional to log c2/c1. The energy which thus disappears is given up by the system in the form of electrical work; and therefore the electromotive force of the concentration-cell must be proportional to log c2/c1. The theory of solutions and their vapour-pressure was not at the time sufficiently developed to enable Helmholtz to determine precisely the coefficient of log c2/c1 in the expression.[1]

An important advance in the theory of solutions was effected in 1887, by a young Swedish physicist, Svante Arrhenius.[2]

  1. The formula given by Helmholtz was that the electromotive force of the cell is equal to b(1 - n)vlog(c2/c1), where c2 and c1 denote the concentrations of the solution at the electrodes, v denotes the volume of one gramme of vapour in equilibrium with the water at the temperature in question, n denotes the transport number for the cation (Hittorf's 1/n), and b denotes q × the lowering of vapour-pressure when one gramme-equivalent of salt is dissolved in q grammes of water, where q denotes a large number.
  2. Zeitschrift für phys. Chem. i (1887), p. 631. Previous investigations, in which the theory was to some extent foreshadowed, were published in Bihang till Sveuska Vet. Ak. Förh. vii (1884), Nos. 13 and 14.