TABLE OF CASES
��N.B. In the page references the figures in larger type indicate that the fads of the case will be found most fully stated on that particular page.
ENGLISH, SCOTCH, IRISH, INDIAN, AND COLONIAL CASES
��Abernethy v. Hutchin- son 209
Adams v. Batley . . 1887 18 Q. B. D., 625
Aflalo V. Lawrence. . — [1902], i Ch., 264
Ager V. CoUingridge . 1886 2 T. L. R., 291
Agar V. P. & O. Steam 1884 26 Ch. D., 637 Navigation Co
��1825 3 L. J. (O.S.), Ch., 37, T,%, 219, 222,
224 144 71 20
��Alexander v. Mackenzie Allen V. Lyon Anglo-Canadian v. Suck
ling Anonymous Case . Anstruther v. Bentley Archbold v. Sweet Austria, Emperor of, v.
Day Avanzo v. Mudie . Avery v. Wood
Bach v. Longman . Baily v. Taylor
��Barfield v. Nicholson
Barnett v. Glossop .
Baschet v. Lojidon Illus- trated Standard
Baskett v. Cunningham .
Baskett v. University of 1758 2 Burr., 661 Cambridge
��20, 102, 118
23, 101, 104
118 191
115 228
214
90
200
144, 156
1777 2 Cowp., 623 36, 97
1829 I Russ. and My., 73 15, 23, 86, 87
105, 109 1824 2 Sim. and Stu., i 1835 I Bing., N. C, 633 — [1900], I Ch., 73
��1847 9 D., 748
1884 5 Ont. Rep., 615
1889 17 Ont. Rep., 239
1774 Lofift, 775
1866 14 W. R., 630
1832 5 C. and P., 219
1861 4 L. T. (N.S.), 494
1854 10 Exch., 203
— [1891], 3 Ch., 115
��1762 I Wm. Black, 370
��62, 220, 229
93
46, 152, 174, 179
180, 201 59. 60 59
��Bastow, ex parte . Beal, ex parte
Beckford v. Hood . Beere v. Ellis Bell V. Walker Bell V. Whitehead . Bensley v. Bignold
��1854 14 C. B., 631 1868 L. R., 3 Q. B., 387
��1798 7 T. R., 620
1889 5 T. L. R., 330
1785 I Bro. Ch. Cas., 450 115
1839 8 L. J. Ch., 141 112
1822 5 B. and Aid., 335 230
��54, 8x. 82
9I' ^73. 179. i^
184 36, 47, 86, 206 138
�� �
