Page:American Historical Review vol. 6.djvu/583

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

Holls : Peace Conference at The Uagiie 573 represented, but each of these six proposed contracts expressly provided that they might be signed at a later date by any of the other parties. Neither the second convention, with respect to the laws and customs of war on land, nor the third convention, for the adaptation to maritime warfare of the Geneva Convention of August 22, 1864, was signed at the time by the United States, or by (rermany, or Austria, or Great Britain. Have they been signed or ratified since. Mr. Holls does not tell us. And why did these, the chief naval and military powers of the world, then decline to join in these important treaties? So with respect to the first and most important convention, for the peaceful adjustment of international differences. The fact is (although it is not stated in Mr. Holls's book) that that convention has now been ratified by all the powers which were represented at the Conference, ex- cept China, Greece, Luxemburg, Mexico, Persia, Servia, Switzerland, Turkey and Bulgaria. This curious agglomeration of non-Christian and weak Christian nations must have some significance. Why did these par- ticular countries delay giving a final assent to a treaty which was designed to substitute justice and reason in the place of force? And why did the strongest and most warlike nations so readily accept it ? Such are some of the questions which Mr. Holls's book suggests, and which he has apparently thought himself bound to leave unanswered. It is the more to be regretted, because he is evidently competent to deal with these subjects, as his interesting work clearly shows. If we criticize it, it is because there is not more of it. The purpose of the book, as declared in the preface, is to give " the story of the Conference and a description of its work" especially for American and English readers. Accordingly, the author in his first two chapters gives an account of the calling of the Conference and of its first meeting. The text of the official circulars of invitation is given in full, as are also the ceremonial addresses at the opening. A complete list of the members, with brief biographical notes as to each, should prove useful. The next three chapters deal in turn with the work of the three com- mittees into which the conference divided itself The recommendations of the several committees are considered point by point, and are eluci- dated by the author's comments and explanations, and by copious ex- tracts from the discussions in committee or in the full Conference. The sixth chapter relates the unsuccessful efforts made by the delegates from the United States to secure action upon the question of immunity of private property upon the high seas, a subject upon which agreement proved impossible, and which was "referred to a future Conference. " These four chapters are the best in the book. The comments and de- bates on the various provisions recommended are vivid and instructive, and indeed are essential to a clear understanding of what was accom- plished. The seventh chapter treats of " The Conference from Day to Day," and the eighth chapter closes the book with a discussion as to the bear- ings of the Conference upon international law and policy. In an ap- VOL. VI. -38.