Page:American Journal of Sociology Volume 5.djvu/250

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

236 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY

in the future, the trusts have not, on the whole, thus far raised prices. The possible danger in this direction, of which I shall speak later, undoubtedly has much to do with popular opposi- tion, and justifies precautionary measures ; but in the main the chief promoters of anti-trust legislation have been those who have been displaced or injured by the improved methods of pro- duction introduced by the trust. While public sympathy may justly be expressed for these unfortunates, even taking the shape of pensions — no more justly, however, than for workmen dis- placed by improved machinery — every argument against the trust put forward by this class is testimony to its value as a labor-saving machine. For example, the president of the Com- mercial Travelers' Association testifies before the Industrial Commission that, because of the concentration of business in the hands of a few great producers, 35,000 salesmen have been thrown out of employment, and 25,000 more have suffered a reduction of salary. He estimates that the annual loss to sales- men is S6o,ooo,ooo, to the hotels 828,000,000, and to the rail- ways S27,000,000. Allowing for exaggeration, the salesmen, hotels, and railways are doubtless learning how the hand-weavers and spinners felt when the spinning-jenny and the power-loom were invented ; but society is as little likely to set aside the new improvement — unless the trust is getting all the benefits. The following serious words from a funny writer' sum up the situa- tion admirably : " Two factors, and two only, have operated to this end [cheapened comforts and raised wages]: labor-saving machinery and organization. The former was the first to be felt. And you have always fought it. Away back, when some- one first learned to make a bronze hatchet, you fought him because his invention threw thousands of honest stone-hatchet makers out of work. And you said the invention was no good, anyway : that a man could brain his neighbor just as handily with a good, honest stone hatchet as with one of those new- fangled things. But the engine came on. You have been butt- ing it ever since. Some of you can still remember how you fought steam-power It would ruin the freighters and

^ Puck, editorial entitled "Butting the Engine," June 7, 1899.