Page:An Essay on the Dramatic Character of Sir John Falstaff (1777).djvu/94

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
( 78 )

management: The conduct of Shakespeare in this respect is admirable, and I could point out a thousand passages which might put to shame the advocates of a formal Chorus, and prove that there is as little of necessity as grace in so mechanic a contrivance[1]. But I confine my censure of the Chorus to its supposed use of comment and interpretation only.


Falstaff is, indeed, as far from appearing to my eye in the light of a Miles Glorisous, that in the best of my taste and judgment, he does not discover, except in consequence of the robbery, the least trait of such a character. All his boasting speeches ate humour, mere humour, and carefully spoken to persons who cannot misapprehend them, who cannot be imposed on: They contain indeed, for the most part, an unreasonable and imprudent ridiculeof

  1. Ænobarbus, in Anthony and Cleopatra, is in effect the Chorus of the Play; as Menenius Agrippa is of Coriolanus.