Page:Ante-Nicene Christian Library Vol 5.djvu/234

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
208
IRENÆUS AGAINST HERESIES.
[Book ii.

curtains[1] as being ten, declaring these a type of the ten Æons; but they have forgotten to count the coverings of skin, which were eleven[2] in number. Nor, again, have they measured the size of these very curtains, each curtain[3] being eight-and-twenty cubits in length. And they set forth the length of the pillars as being ten cubits, with a reference to the Decad of Æons. "But the breadth of each pillar was a cubit and a half;"[4] and this they do not explain, any more than they do the entire number of the pillars or of their bars, because that does not suit the argument. But what of the anointing oil,[5] which sanctified the whole tabernacle? Perhaps it escaped the notice of the Saviour, or, while their Mother was sleeping, the Demiurge of himself gave instructions as to its weight; and on this account it is out of harmony with their Pleroma, consisting,[6] as it did, of five hundred shekels of myrrh, five hundred of cassia, two hundred and fifty of cinnamon, two hundred and fifty of calamus, and oil in addition, so that it was composed of five ingredients. The incense[7] also, in like manner, [was compounded] of stacte, onycha, galbanum, mint, and frankincense, all which do in no respect, either as to their mixture or weight, harmonize with their argument. It is therefore unreasonable and altogether absurd [to maintain] that the types were not preserved in the sublime and more imposing enactments of the law; but in other points, when any number coincides with their assertions, to affirm that it was a type of the things in the Pleroma; while [the truth is, that] every number occurs with the utmost variety in the Scriptures, so that, should any one desire it, he might form not only an Ogdoad, and a Decad, and a Duodecad, but any sort of number from the Scriptures, and then maintain that this was a type of the system of error devised by himself.

4. But that this point is true, that that number which is called five, which agrees in no respect with their argument, and does not harmonize with their system, nor is suitable for

  1. Ex. xxvi. 1.
  2. Ex. xxvi. 7.
  3. Ex. xxvi. 2.
  4. Ex. xxvi. 16.
  5. Ex. xxvi. 26.
  6. Ex. xxx. 23, etc.
  7. Ex. xxx. 34.