denarii, and found the beaded circle impreſſed on them to coincide very nearly with Mr. Greaves's proportion of the digitus.
Dr. Murdoch himſelf cannot diſcover the length of the Roman itinerary foot, as he calls it, from any of his calculations. In the eſtimation of the diſtance between Bologna and Modena, he computes the Roman foot at one-ſixty-fourth, or a quarter of a digit, leſs than the Engliſh : in reckoning the diſtance between London and Verulam, he makes it to be one-thirty-ſecond, or half a digit, leſs; which differs very little[1] from the proportion aſſigned by Mr. Greaves.
Again, he computes the Roman itinerary foot to be to the Engliſh as forty-five to forty-four, or one-forty-fourth part greater. Such confuſion ariſes from unauthoriſed ſuppoſitions. The Roman itinerary foot, as diſtinguiſhed from the common Roman foot, is to me as viſionary as the pes monetalis of Athens.
Gold Coins. | Diameter of the beaded circle in decimals of an inch | |
Veſpafian | .71 | |
Trajan | .74 | |
Trajan | .725 | |
Hadrian | .74 | |
Reverſe | .725 | |
Silver Coins. | ||
Conſular | .695 | |
Conſular | .725 | |
Conſular | .725 | |
Divililius | .72 5 | |
Divus Augutius | .725 | |
Claudius | .695 | |
Domitian | .725 | |
Domitian | .70 | |
Domitian | .69 | |
Domitian | .71 | |
Trajan | .71 | |
Trajan | .71 | |
Hadrian | .71 | |
Hadrian | .705 | |
Marc. Aurelius | .725 | |
Alex. Severus | .71 | bad ſilver |
Gordian | .775 | bad ſilver |
Philippus | .82 | bad ſilver |
- ↑ 967:1000::31:32.005.
Having