Page:Berejiklian v Independent Commission Against Corruption.pdf/4

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

Taylor v Public Service Board (New South Wales) (1976) 137 CLR 208; [1976] HCA 36

Washer v Western Australia (2007) 234 CLR 492; [2007] HCA 48

Wilkinson v Osborne (1915) 21 CLR 89; [1915] HCA 92

Woodham v Independent Commission Against Corruption (1993) 30 ALD 390

Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer v Hill [2020] NSWCA 54

Xiao v BCEG International (Australia) Pty Ltd (2023) 111 NSWLR 132; [2023] NSWCA 48

Texts Cited: Anne Twomey, The Constitution of New South Wales (2004, Federation Press)

Explanatory Note to Independent Commission Against Corruption Bill 1988 (No 2) (NSW)

Independent Commission Against Corruption Bill 1988 (No 2) (NSW)

Independent Commission Against Corruption, Investigation into the conduct of the then member of Parliament for Wagga Wagga and then Premier and others (Operation Keppel) (June 2023)

Sir Frederick Jordan, Chapters on Equity in New South Wales (6th ed, 1947, Thomas Henry Tennant)

Category: Prinicpal judgment
Parties: Gladys Berejiklian (Applicant)

Independent Commission Against Corruption (Respondent)

Parties: Counsel:

B Walker SC and H Cooper (Applicant)

S Free SC and J Kennedy (Respondent)


Solicitors:

Johnson Winter Slattery (Applicant)

Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Respondent)

File Number(s): 2023/302494
Publication restriction: Nil

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]