Page:Books Condemned to be Burnt - James Anson Farrer.djvu/73

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Book-Fires under James I.

he prohibited hunting); and Roger Coke says that the books being out, "the proclamation could not call them in, but only served to make them more taken notice of."[1]

That books were often suppressed or called in without being publicly burnt is well shown by Heylin's remark about Mocket's book (presently referred to), that it was "thought ifit not only to call it in, but to expiate the errors of it in a public flame."[2] Among works thus suppressed without being burnt may be mentioned Bishop Thomborough's two books in favour of the union between England and Scotland (1604), Lord Coke's Speech and Charge at the Norwich Assizes (1607), and Sir W. Raleigh's first volume of the History of the World {1614), I suspect that Scott's Discoverie was likewise only suppressed, and that Voet erroneously thought that this involved and implied a public burning.

But it was not for long that James had saved Cowell's life, for the latter's death the following year, and soon after the resignation of his professorship, is said by Fuller to have been hastened by the trouble about his book. The King through-

  1. Detection of Court and State of England (1696), I. 30.
  2. Life of Laud, 70