Page:Burwell v Hobby Lobby.pdf/7

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Cite as: 573 U. S. ____ (2014)
1

Opinion of the Court

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to
notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington,
D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order
that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


Nos. 13–354 and 13–356


SYLVIA BURWELL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., PETITIONERS

13–354
v.

HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., et al.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

AND

CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALTIES CORPORATION et al., PETITIONERS

13–356
v.

SYLVIA BURWELL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

[June 30, 2014]

Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court.

We must decide in these cases whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), 107 Stat. 1488, 42 U. S. C. §2000bb et seq., permits the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to demand that three closely held corporations provide health-insurance coverage for methods of contraception that violate the sincerely held religious beliefs of the companies' owners. We hold that the regulations that impose this obligation violate RFRA, which prohibits the