CLEMENT
21
CLEMENT
Apostolic See, and an example was furnished which
the greatest soldier of the papacy, (iil d'Albornoz
(q. v.), would better before the century was over.
Process of Boniface VIII. — Almost at once King
Philip demanded from the new pope a formal con-
demnation of the memory of Boniface VIII; only
thus could the royal hate be placated. The king
wished the name of Boniface stricken from the list of
popes as a heretic, his bones disinterred, burned, and
the ashes scattered to the winds. This odious and
disgraceful step Clement sought to avert, partly by
delay, partly by new favours to the king; he renewed
the absolution granted the king by Benedict XI,
created nine French cardinals out of a group of ten,
restored to the Colonna cardinals their places in the
Sacred College, and accorded the king tithes of church
property for five years. Finally, ho withdrew the
Bull "Clericis Laicos", though not the earlier legisla-
tion on which it was ba.sed, and declared that the
doctrinal Bull "Unam Sanctam" affected in no dis-
advantageous manner the meritorious French king,
and implied for him and his kingdom no greater
degree of subjection to the papal see than formerly
existed. The pope was also helpful to Charles of
Valois, the king's brother, and pretender to the im-
perial throne of Constantinople, by granting him a
two years' tithe of church revenues; Clement hoped
that a crusade operating from a reconquered Con-
stantinople would be successful. In May, 1.307, at
Poitiers, where peace was made between England and
France, Philip again insisted on a canonical process
for condemnation of the memory of Boniface VIII,
as a heretic, a blasphemer, an immoral priest, etc.
Eventually, the pope made answer that so grave a
matter could not be settled outside of a general
council, and the king for a while seemed satisfied with
this solution. Nevertheless, he returned frequently
and urgently to liis proposition. It was in vain that
the pope exhibited a willingness to sacrifice the Tem-
plars (see below); the merciless king, sure of his
power, pressed for the opening of this unique trial,
unheard of since the time of Pope Formosus. Clem-
ent had to yield, and designated 2 February, 1309,
as the date, and Avignon as the place for the trial of
his dead predecessor on the shameful charges so long
colported about Europe by the Colonna cardinals
and their faction. In the document (citation) that
called (13 September, 1309) for the witnesses, Clement
expressed his personal conviction of the innocence
of Boniface, at the same time his resolution to satisfy
the king. Though the pope had soon (2 February,
1310) to protest against a false interpretation of his own words, the process was really begun in a con- sistory of 16 March, 1310, at Avignon. Much delay followed, on one side and the other, apropos chiefly of methods of procedure. Early in 1311, witnesses were examined outside of Avignon, in France, and in Italy, but by French commissaries and mostly on the above-mentioned charges of the Colonna (see Bom- pace VIII). Finally, in February, 1311, the king wrote to Clement abandoning the process to the future council (of Vicnne) or to the pope's own action, and promising to cause the withdrawal of the charges; at the same time he protested that his intentions had been pure. One price of these welcome concessions was a formal declaration by Pope Clement (27 April,
1311) of the king's innocence and that of his friends; these representatives of France, the "Israel of the New Alliance ", had acted, said the pope, in good faith and with a pure zeal, nor should they fear in the future any canonical detriment from the events of Anagni. William Nogaret was excepted, but on his protestation of innocence, and at the intercession of Philip, a penance was imposed on him and he too received absolution. Only those who detained ec- clesiastical property were finally excluded from par- don. The reUgious zeal of Philip was again acknowl-
edged; all papal acts detrimental to him and his
kingdom since November, 1302, were rescinded; the
erasures are yet visible in the "Regeata" of Boniface
VIII, in the Vatican Archives (see Tosti, "Storia di
Bonifazio VIII", Rome, 18S6, II, 343-44). This
painful situation was closed for Clement V by the
Council of Vienne (16 October, 1311), most of whose
members were personally favourable to Boniface.
It is not certain that the council took up formally
the question of the gviilt or innocence of Boniface. In
their present shape the official Acts of the council are
silent, nor do all contemporary writers mention it as a
fact. It is true that Giovanni ViUani describes Philip
and his counsellors as urgent for the condemnation of
Boniface by the council, but, he says, the memory
of the pope was formally purged from all adverse
charges Ijy three cardinals and several jurists; more-
over, three Catalonian knights offered to defend with
their swords the good name of the Gaetani pope
against all comers, whereupon the king yielded, and
demanded only that he be declared guiltless of any
responsibility for the turn affairs had taken. With
the death of his personal enemies, opposition to Boni-
face diminished, and liis legitimacy was no longer
denied even in France (Balan, "II processo di Boni-
fazio VIII", Rome, ISSl).
Cleiient V AND THE Templars. — Since the final expulsion (1291) of the crusading forces from the Holy Land, the ecclesiastico-military orders in Europe had aroused much adverse criticism, partly because to their jealousies (Templars, Hospitallers or Knights of .St. John, Teutonic Order) was attributed the humil- iating defeat, partly because of the vast wealth they had acquired in their short existence. The Templars (so-called from the Temple of Jerusalem, pauperes commilitotws Christi Templique Solomonici, i. e. poor fellow-soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solo- mon) were the richest. Their fortress-like monas- teries, known as Temples, arose in every European land, and by the end of the thirteenth century sheltered the chief banking-system of Europe; the knights were trusted by popes and kings and by per- sons of wealth because of their uprightness, the good management of their affairs, and their solid credit based on the countless estates of the order and its widespread financial relations. Already, before the accession of Pope Clement, their status was growing perilous; apart from the envy aroused by their riches, accusations of pride, exclusiveness, usurpation of episcopal rights, etc. were raised against them. They had resisted several attempts to unite their order with the Hospitallers, and while it is no longer easy to fix the degree of their popularity with the common people, it is certain that in many quarters of Europe they had aroused the cupiility of princes and the jealousy of many higher ecclesiastics, especially in France; without the co-operation of the latter they could never have fallen in so tragic a manner. Their story is told in full in the article Templars; hence, to avoid repetition, it will suffice to mention here the principal facts. In the first year of the pontificate of Clement V the French king began to demand from the pope the sup|ir(!ssion of this ecclesiastical order and to set afoot a campaign of violence and calumny such as had so far succeeded in the case of Boniface VIII. If the pope, as was naturally to be feared, refused finally to yield in the matter of the process against his predecessor's memory, he would surely be glad to buy relief with the sacrifice of the Tem- plars. Owing to the weakness and irresolution of Pope Clement, the royal plan succeeded. After an unsuccessful attempt of the pope (in August, 1307) to unite the Templars and the Hospitallers, he yielded to the demands of King Philip and ordered an inves- tigation of the order, against which the king brought charges of heresy (renunciation of Christ, immorality, idolatry, contempt of the Mass, denial of the sacra-
