Page:Catholic Encyclopedia, volume 6.djvu/878

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
792

GREGORY


792


GREGORY


hands of the Roman nobility and the Normans, was largely recovered, and the revenues of the Holy See, whose treasury had been depleted, speedily augmented. By Leo IX he was also appointed prwpositus or pro- visor (not abbot) of the monastery of St. Paul extra Muros. The unchecked violence of the lawless bands of the Campagna had brought great destitution upon this venerable establishment. Monastic discipline was so impaired that the monks were attended in their refectory by women; and the sacred edifices were so neglected that the sheep and cattle freely roamed in and out through the broken doors. By rigorous re- forms and a wise administration Hildebrand succeeded in restoring the ancient rule of the abbey with the austere observance of earlier times; and he continued throughout life to manifest the deepest attachment for the famous house which his energy had reclaimed from ruin and decay. In 1054 he was sent to France as papal legate to examine the cause of Berengarius. While still in Tours he learned of the death of Leo IX, and on hastening back to Rome found that the clergy and people were eager to elect him, the most trusted friend and counsellor of Leo, as the successor. This proposal of the Romans was, however, resisted by Hildebrand, who set out for Germany at the head of an embassy to implore a nomination from the emperor. The negotiations, which lasted eleven months, ulti- mately resulted in the selection of Hildebrand's candidate, Gebhard, Bishop of Eichstadt, who was consecrated at Rome, 13 April, 1055, under the name of Victor II. During the reign of this pontiff, the cardinal-subdeacon steadily maintained, and even increased the ascendancy which by his commanding genius he had acquired during the pontificate of Leo IX. Near the close of the year 1057 he went once more to Germany to reconcile the Empress-regent Agnes and her court to the (merely) canonical election of Pope Stephen X (1057-1058). His mission was not yet accomplished when Stephen died at Florence, and although the d3ang pope had forbidden the people to appoint a successor before Hildebrand returned, the Tusoulan faction seized the opportunity to set up a member of the Crescentian family, John Mincius, Bishop of Velletri, imder the title of Benedict X. With masterly skill Hildebrand succeeded in defeating the schemes of the hostile party, and secured the election of Gerard, Bishop of Florence, a Burgundian by birth, who assumed the name of Nicholas II (1059-1061).

The two most important transactions of this ponti- ficate — the celebrated decree of election, by which the power of choosing the pope was vested in the college of cardinals, and the alliance with the Normans, se- cured by the Treaty of Melfi, 1059 — were in large measure the achievement of Hildebrand, whose power and influence had now become supreme in Rome. It was perhaps inevitable that the issues raised by the new decree of election should not be decided without a conflict, and with the passing away of Nicholas II in 1061, that conflict came. But when it was ended, after a schism enduring for some years, the imperial party with its Antipope C'adalous had been discom- fited, and Anselm of Baggio, the candidate of Hilde- brand and the reform party, successfully enthroned in the Lateran Palace as .Alexander II. By Nicholas II, in 1059, Hildebrand had been raised to the dignity and office of Archdeacon of the Holy Roman Church, and Alexander II now made him Chancellor of the Apos- tolic See. On 21 April, 107.S, Alexander II died. The time at length had come when Hildebrand, who for more than twenty years had been the most prominent figure in the Church, who had been chiefly instru- mental in the .selection of her rulers, who had inspired and given purpose to her policy, and who had been steadily developing and realizing, by successive acts, her sovereignly and puril y, should assume in his own person the in;ijcsfy and responsibility of that exalted power which his genius had so long directed.


On the day following the death of Alexander II, as the obsequies of the deceased pontiff were being per- formed in the Lateran basilica, there arose, of a sud- den, a loud outcry from the whole multitude of clergy and people: "Let Hildebrand be pope!" "Blessed Peter has chosen Hildebrand the Archdeacon!" All remonstrances on the part of the archdeacon were vain, his protestations fruitless. Later, on the same day, Hildebrand was conducted to the church of San Pietro in Vincoli, and there elected in legal form by the assembled cardinals, with the due consent of the Roman clergy and amid the repeated acclama- tions of the people. That this extraordinary out- burst on the part of the clergy and people in favour of Hildebrand could have been the result of some pre- concerted arrangement, as is sometimes alleged, does not appear likely. Hildebrand was clearly the man of the hour, his austere virtue commanded respect, his genius admiration; and the promptitude and unanim- ity with which he was chosen would indicate, rather, a general recognition of his fitness for the high office. In the decree of election those who had chosen him as pontiff proclaimed him "a devout man, a man mighty in human and divine knowledge, a distinguished lover of equity and justice, a man firm in adversity and temperate in prosperity, a man, according to the say- ing of the Apostle, of good behaviour, blameless, modest, sober, chaste, given to hospitality, and one that ruleth well his own house ; a man from his child- hood generously brought up in the bosom of this Mother Church, and for the merit of his life already raised to the archidiaconal dignity". "We choose then", they said to the people, "our Archdeacon Hildebrand to be pope and successor to the Apostle, and to bear henceforward and forever the name of Gregory" (22 April, 1073), Mansi, "Conciliorum Col- lectio", XX, 60.

The decree of Nicholas II having expressly, if vaguely acknowledged the right of the emperor to have some voice in papal elections, Hildebrand de- ferred the ceremony of his consecration imtil he had received the royal sanction. In sending the formal annoimceraent of his elevation to Henry IV of Ger- many, he took occasion to indicate frankly the atti- tude, which, as sovereign pontiff, he was prepared to assume in dealing with the Christian princes, and, with a note of grave personal warning besought the king not to bestow his approval. The Cierman bish- ops, apprehensive of the severity with which such a man as Hildebrand would carry out 'the decrees of reform, endeavoured to prevent the king from assent^ ing to the election; but upon the favourable report of Count Eberhard of Nellenburg, who had been de- spatched to Rome to assert the rights of the crown, Henry gave his approval (it proved to be the last instance in history of a papal election being ratified by an emperor), and the new pope, in the meanwhile ordained to the priesthood, was solemnly consecrated on the Feast of Sts. Peter and Paul, 29 June, 1073. In assuming the name of Gregory VII, Hildebrand not only honoured the memory and character of his earliest patron, (iregory VI, but also proclaimed to the world the legitimacy of that pontiff's title.

From the letters which Gregory addressed to his friends shortly after his election, imploring their in- tercession with heaven in his behalf, and begging their sympathy and support, it is abundantly evident that he assimied the burden of the pontificate, which had been thrust on him, only with the strongest reluctance, and not wilhout a great struggle of mind. To Desid- erius. Abbot of Monte Cassino, he speaks of his eleva- tion in terms of terror, gi\'ing utterance to the words of the Psalmist: " I am come into deej) waters, so that the floods run over me"; "Fearfulness and trembling are come upon me, and darkness hath covered me." And in view of the appalling nature of the task that lay before him (of its difficulties no one indeed had a