CHAPTER VI
A CRITICISM OF BLEULER'S “THEORY OF SCHIZOPHRENIC NEGATIVISM.”[1]
Bleuler's work contains a noteworthy clinical analysis of “Negativism.” Besides giving a very precise and discerning summary of the various manifestations of negativism, the author presents us with a new psychological conception well worthy of attention, viz. the concept of ambivalency and of
ambitendency, thus formulating the psychological axiom that every tendency is balanced by its opposite tendency (to this must be added that positive action is produced by a comparatively small leaning to one side of the scale). Similarly all other tendencies, under the stress of emotions, are balanced by their opposites—thus giving an ambivalent character to
their expression. This theory rests on clinical observation of katatonic negativism, which more than proves the existence of contrasting tendencies and values. These facts are well known to psychoanalysis, where they are summed up under the concept of resistance. But this must not be taken as meaning that every positive psychic action simply calls up its opposite. One may easily gain the impression from Bleuler's work that his standpoint is that, cum grano salis the conception, or the tendency of the Schizophrenic is always accompanied by its opposite. For instance, Bleuler says:—
1. “Disposing causes of negativistic phenomena are: the ambitendency by which every impulse is accompanied by its opposite.”
2. “Ambivalency, which gives two opposed emotional expressions to the same idea, and would regard that idea as positive and negative at the same time.”
- ↑ “Sonderabdruck aus dem Jahrbuch für psychoanalytische und psychopathologische Forschungen,” vol. III.
