Page:Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices (1973).pdf/135

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
3-17
Ch. 3
3.3.1
3.3.1
Factors raising questions as to publication.(cont'd)
II.
Appearance of Copies.(cont'd)
c.
(cont'd)
2.
In certain cases the rough or tentative nature of the notice may furnish a reason to question whether the work has actually been published.
3.
In appropriate cases the nature of the notice may prompt a search of the correspondence records to determine whether the claim had previously been rejected for pub­lication without statutory notice.
d.

The fact that the copies bear a statement indicat­ing that their distribution has been restricted or limited in some way will not generally be

sufficient cause to question publication.
Examples:
(1)
"Confidential--these specifications are for subscribers' use only"
(2)
"Not for general distribution"
(3)
"For professional use only"
e.
Where the copy of a work submitted for registra­tion in unpublished form bears the prescribed notice and is printed or otherwise susceptible of publication, registration will generally be defer­ red and the applicant informed of the necessity for making a new registration after publication. If the applicant, after being informed, still desires an unpublished registration, it will not be refused. (See item 3.2.3.1, above.)
f.
Where an application is submitted for a pictorial or graphic work, whether as unpublished or pub­lished, and the transmittal letter accompanying the application bears the same work, without notice. as part of the letterhead design, publi­cation with notice will be questioned.