courage in the face of adversity and bring integrity back to this process.
Madam Speaker, I yield the balance of my time to the gentleman from the great State of Texas (Mr. Arrington).
Mr. Arrington. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman from the great State of Florida (Mrs. Cammack), my friend.
Madam Speaker, as Americans, we believe governments receive their just powers from the consent of the governed. That sacred transaction can only happen legitimately in a free and fair election.
Election integrity is the very lifeblood of our unrivaled system of self-government. The law and the Constitution gave Congress not only the authority but, I believe, the responsibility to serve as the last check on the integrity of our Presidential elections. We either believe, according to statute, that every elector was “lawfully certified” and “regularly given,” or we don’t.
States certainly have broad delegated powers to administer Federal elections, but they still must operate within the bounds of the Constitution.
Despite receiving numerous petitions—to the detriment of the country, I might add—the Supreme Court failed to answer the most important question of the 2020 election: Can entities outside of the State legislatures make election law?
The plain language of Article II of the Constitution answers the question unequivocally no.
The decisions made today in these Chambers are of the utmost consequence, and the horrible precedent that will be established if we don’t act will have lasting impact on our beloved Republic.
Madam Speaker, this proceeding is not just about the integrity of this election. It is about ensuring the integrity of all future elections.
I take no pleasure or pride in making my objection today, nor do I wish for any State electors to be disqualified. However, based on the law, the Constitution, and my conscience, I cannot support certifying votes from any State that violated the Constitution.
Madam Speaker, this decision is not about loyalty to a President. It is about my fidelity to the Constitution and the oath that I swore.
Mr. Lamb. Madam Speaker, I rise in opposition.
The Speaker. The gentleman from Pennsylvania is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. Lamb. Madam Speaker, I came here tonight prepared to talk about the place I represent and how well the Democratic and Republican county officials ran our election. I wanted to point out that in my home county of Allegheny County, in the place they were counting the votes, there were 31 video cameras—31—in the same place, just showing people counting votes, every single one of them on paper, with representatives from both campaigns watching.
Madam Speaker, I wanted to point out to all these great lovers and supporters of the Pennsylvania legislature that it was the Republican Pennsylvania legislature that passed a Republican bill that they all voted for and supported that set up the system under which we just ran the election, and that the reason the President lost was because he was not as popular as other Republicans in our State. He got fewer votes than all of them.
Madam Speaker, I wanted to lay out all this evidence because I thought it was a sign of respect for my colleagues and for all the Americans out there who don’t know who to trust. I was raised on that. I was raised on that respect, which makes this a hard speech for me to give. Because to do this with any kind of honesty means admitting and declaring in this House that these objections don’t deserve an ounce of respect—not an ounce.
□ 0140
A woman died out there tonight, and you are making these objections.
Let’s be clear about what happened in this Chamber today. Invaders came in for the first time since the War of 1812. They desecrated these Halls and this Chamber and practically every inch of ground where we work. For the most part, they walked in here free. A lot of them walked out free. There wasn’t a person watching at home who didn’t know why that was—because of the way that they look.
My point, Madam Speaker, is this: Enough has been done here already to try to strip this Congress of its dignity, and these objectors don’t need to do anymore.
We know that that attack today didn’t materialize out of nowhere. It was inspired by lies, the same lies that you are hearing in this room tonight. And the Members who are repeating those lies should be ashamed of themselves. Their constituents should be ashamed of them.
We know what is going to happen as soon as I walk away, what has happened all night tonight, what will continue to happen. They will take these same symbols, these same concepts, smuggle them into their arguments, and make the same arguments. I want people at home, anyone who is still watching, to know that these arguments are not for them; they are for you.
None of the evidence we wanted to discuss here tonight will change their opinions or what they are about to say. But you need to know that is not the end. It is not as if there is nothing we can do because of that. And if there was, I don’t think this Nation would have made it to almost 250 years.
The fact is, Madam Speaker, that at the end of the day, people—
POINT OF ORDER
Mr. Griffith. Madam Speaker, point of order.
The Speaker. The gentleman will state his point of order.
Mr. Griffith. Yes, ma’am. The point of order would be that the gentleman said that there were lies on this floor here today, looking over in this direction. I ask that those words be taken down.
We may have a disagreement on matters, but—
The Speaker. The gentleman’s demand is not timely.
The gentleman from Pennsylvania will proceed.
Mr. Lamb. Madam Speaker, the fact is, at the end of the day, it hurts. It hurts them; it hurts this country. It hurts all of us. But the fact is that the people have made this country work by not giving in.
Go ahead. Shout it out.
One last thing to say, Madam Speaker. And I thank you for your patience. All people need to know tonight, Madam Speaker—
Madam Speaker, the truth hurts. But the fact is this: We want this government to work more than they want it to fail.
After everything that has happened today, we want that more than ever. Know that. Know that, the people watching at home. We want this government to work. We will make it work. They will not make it fail.
PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY
Mr. Perry. Madam Speaker, parliamentary inquiry.
The Speaker. The gentleman will state his parliamentary inquiry.
Mr. Perry. When is the appropriate time to ask that the words be stricken, be taken down?
The Speaker. Immediately after the words are uttered.
For what purpose does the gentleman from Louisiana seek recognition?
Mr. Higgins of Louisiana. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of the objection.
The Speaker. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. Higgins of Louisiana. Madam Speaker, my, my, my. Let us take a deep breath, shall we?
Madam Speaker, the cornerstone of the strength of our American Republic is not only the peaceful transition of power; it is the peaceful transition of a lawful power. It is within the parameters of our oath, indeed, is our duty to inquire if we suspect that perhaps our elections have been compromised.
Much has been said about what we do not know. What we do not know calls for investigation.
What we do know is that, in the disputed States, Governors, secretaries of state, or local election commissions acted in violation of the Election Clause of the U.S. Constitution, wherein State legislatures are granted the sole authority to determine how Presidential electors are appointed. It is that simple. State executive officials usurped the constitutionally vested authority of State legislatures within several of the sovereign States.
Now, why we are involved in Congress? Because the Founders gave us a
