Page:Cricket, by WG Grace.djvu/112

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

the quality of the batting at that period. At the end of 1864:

R. Carpenter had played 19 innings, average 25.6
G. Parr " 21 " " 24.18
T. Hayward " 18 " " 16.13
R. Daft " 18 " " 16.11
T. Hearne " 17 " " l6.13
H. H. Stephenson " 24 " " 16.2
G. Anderson " 14 " " 13.9
J.Jackson " 18 " " 13.11
W. Caffyn " 24 " " 12.5
J. Grundy " 24 " " 11.11
R. C. Tinley " 21 " " 10.5
E. Willsher " 24 " " 10.3
J.Wisden " 17 " " 8.6
G. Tarrant " 9 " " 7.6

Those were the most celebrated players of both elevens.

When we turn to the doings of the Gentlemen and Players there is a different story to tell. These matches were commenced in 1806. At the end of 1864 results showed that the Players had won 39, the Gentlemen 14, and 3 were drawn; and that the century had been exceeded 8 times; seven of them to the credit of the Players, one to the credit of the Gentlemen.

If we remember that in the majority of the matches won by the Gentlemen, they were either playing extra men, or had one or two players given them, it will be easily seen that the best of our amateur talent was very far behind the best of our professional. From 1854 to 1864 the Gentlemen were completely out of the running. Out of the 19 matches played between those years, the Players won 18, and 1 was drawn.

That was the state of affairs at the end of 1864; and when it was announced that 60 young players had applied and been recommended to play in the Nottinghamshire Colts' Match on Easter Monday, 1865, and that