when we compare them with the doings of the great players of the past and of his own time, we can understand the sensation he created between 1862 and 1865.
Mynn and Pilch were two of the best batsmen between 1830 and 1850. I give their doings in 1843 and 1844:—
Mynn in 1843 played 28 innings, scored 471 runs, average 16.23; most in an innings, 73.
In 1844 he played 36 innings, scored 439 runs, average 12.7; most in an innings, 48.
Pilch in 1843 played 22 innings, scored 525 runs, average 23.19; most in an innings, 89.
In 1844, 41 innings, 592 runs, average 14.18; most in an innings, 50.
In 1862 and 1863, Anderson, Hayward, Daft, Parr, and Carpenter were the crack batsmen:—
| R. Carpenter in | 1862 | averaged | 31.20 | for | 38 innings. | |
| R. Daft | " | " | 22.6 | " | 22 | " |
| T. Hayward | " | " | 21.12 | " | 62 | " |
| G. Anderson | " | " | 19.5 | " | 53 | " |
| G. Parr | " | " | 13.39 | " | 43 | " |
E. M. GRACE.
1862 .. 40 innings, 2190 runs; average, 40.30.
The year 1862 is hardly a fair comparison, for the majority of the matches in which E. M. played were not first-class. The year after, when he played for the All-England Eleven, South v. North, and Gentlemen v. Players, is a fairer test:—
1863.—First-class Matches only.
| R. Daft ... | 9 innings, | 313 runs, | average | 34.7 |
| G. Anderson ... | 10 " | 287 " | " | 28.7 |
| P. Hayward ... | 16 " | 392 " | " | 24.8 |
| R. Carpenter ... | 22 " | 447 " | " | 20.7 |
| G. Parr ... | 16 " | 204 " | " | 12.12 |
E. M. GRACE.
27 innings ... 964 runs ... average 35.19
