Page:Current Strategies for Engineering Controls in Nanomaterial Production and Downstream Handling Processes.pdf/53

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

that it could be adequately closed) and subsequent closing appeared to efficiently aerosolize CNF material through the bag opening into the workplace environment. This resulted in an increase in respirable mass concentration and a dark visible airborne CNF plume.

A few studies have been conducted to look at the emission of nanoparticles from downstream products during machining of nanocomposites. Methner et al. [2007] reported increases in total carbon (a marker for nanoparticles), particle number, and mass concentration during the wet sawing of a CNF-impregnated composite. However, the increase in particle concentration was primarily of particles greater than 400 nm in diameter. Vorbau et. al. [2009] evaluated nanoparticle release from oak and steel panels coated with polyurethane mixed with zinc oxide nanoparticles. A standard abrasive test rig was used to provide uniform conditions for testing the release of particles from the surface of the panels. During the abrasion tests, no significant release of particles below 100 nm was observed. However, the nanoscale zinc oxide particles were embedded in the aerosols with larger surface area. Bello et al. [2009] evaluated the release of nanoscale particles during dry and wet cutting of nanocomposite materials. Two composites were used for evaluation: a CNT-enhanced graphite prepreg laminate sheet and a woven alumina fiber cloth with CNTs grown on the surface of the fibers. Significant exposures to nanoscale particles were generated during dry cutting of all composites with emission levels being related to composite material and thickness; wet cutting reduced exposures to background levels.

For all processes/tasks discussed, engineering controls should be adapted for the specific process. Acceptable exhaust volumes and capture velocities may differ from currently available guidance due to differences in materials being handled. Pilot testing of any controls should be conducted to evaluate proper control operation and verify that exposures are controlled to desired levels.


3.4.3.1 Product Discharge/Bag Filling

The process of filling bags with nanomaterials is commonly done following large-scale production or refining processes. The off-loading of product after spray drying, for example, may be a significant source of exposure when post-processing nanomaterials. In the spray-drying process, a mixture of liquid and powder ingredients (slurry) is sprayed within a large sealed tank. Heat within the tank dries the slurry droplets, leaving a powder as the finished product. When the process is completed, the powder product is commonly discharged into a bulk tote or drum before packaging. Methner et al. [2010] reported exposure measurements at 12 facilities and noted that the highest background-adjusted concentration was observed during spray dryer drum changeout. Evans et al. [2010] reported exposures related to changing out a drum that collected fugitive CNF materials from a process reactor using a baghouse filtration system. Even though the processes differ, the tasks for each of these steps are similar and include the removal of the drum from the process outlet. These drums are often sealed to the process outlet minimizing exposure during production but potentially expose workers when removing the drums or liners.

38

Current Strategies for Engineering Controls in Nanomaterial Production and Downstream Handling Processes