Page:Dan McKenzie - Aromatics and the Soul.pdf/121

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Theories of Olfaction
109

each cubic centimetre of air, or, assuming 50 cubic centimetres of air as the minimum needed for olfaction, the amount of chlorphenol capable of exciting sensation is 14,600,000 of the thousandth part of a gram—approximately 1276,000,000 of a grain !

Many other odours have been similarly tested, and although there is much numerical discrepancy in the records made by different observers, all agree as to the extreme delicacy of the sense, (For vanillin and mercaptan, see p. 39.)

Those experiments and estimations explain how it comes about that many odours (musk, for example) may go on giving off their scent until they part with the whole of it without undergoing any appreciable loss of weight.

Thus there is no chemical test known to us so delicate as olfaction.

It has been found, for example, that over-assiduous efforts at filtering and purifying the air used for ventilation so as to remove all noxious chemical and bacterial ingredients defeat their own end. Such air, although to our artificial tests absolutcly clean and pure, seems to the sense of smell to lack freshness. And the nose is right. The tests are wrong. For sojourn in such an atmosphere induces lassitude and torpor of mind, as members of the Houses of Parliament, where this method has been tried, know to their cost—and ours.