Page:Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1827) Vol 1.djvu/129

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE.
105

CHAP. IV.
_____
The minister Perennis.
mans. The kind cruelty of Commodus united them in death[1].

The tyrant's rage, after having shed the noblest blood of the senate, at length recoiled on the principal instrument of his cruelty. Whilst Commodus was immersed in blood and luxury, he devolved the detail of the pubhc business on Perennis ; a servile and ambitious minister, who had obtained his post by the murder of his predecessor, but who possessed a considerable share of vigour and ability. By acts of extortion, and the forfeited estates of the nobles sacrificed to his avarice, he had accumulated an immense treasure. The pretorian guards were under his immediate command ; and his son, who already discovered a military genius, was at the head of the Illyrian legions. Perennis aspired to the empire ; or what, in the eyes of Commodus, amounted to the same crime, he was capable of aspiring to it, had he not been prevented, surprised, and put to death. The fall of a A. D. 186.minister is a very trifling incident in the general history of the empire ; but it was hastened by an extraordinary circumstance, which proved how much the nerves of discipline were already relaxed. The legions of Britain, discontented with the administration of Perennis, formed a deputation of fifteen hundred select men, with instructions to march to Rome, and lay their complaints before the emperor. These military petitioners, by their own determined behaviour, by inflaming the divisions of the guards, by exaggerating the strength of the British army, and by alarming the fears of Commodus, exacted and obtained the minister's death, as the only redress of their grievances[2]. This presumption of a distant army, and their discovery of the weakness of government, was a sure presage of the most dreadful convulsions.

  1. In a note upon the Augustan History, Casaubon has collected a number of particulars concerning these celebrated brothers. See p. 96 of his learned commentary.
  2. Dion. 1. Ixxii. p. 1210; Herodian, 1. i. p. 22; Hist. August, p. 4B. Dion gives a much less odious character of Perennis than the other historians. His moderation is almost a pledge of his veracity.