Page:Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1827) Vol 2.djvu/239

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

221

from the citizens of Tyre is still extant. He praises their zeal and devotion in terms of the highest satisfaction, descants on the obstinate impiety of the christians, and betrays, by the readiness with which he consents to their banishment, that he considered himself as receiving, rather than as conferring, an obligation. The priests as well as the magistrates were empowered to enforce the execution of his edicts, which were engraved on tables of brass; and though it was recommended to them to avoid the effusion of blood, the most cruel and ignominious punishments were inflicted on the refractory christians[1].

The Asiatic christians had every thing to dread from the severity of a bigoted monarch, who prepared his measures of violence with such deliberate policy. But a few months had scarcely elapsed, before the edicts published by the two western emperors obliged Maximin to suspend the prosecution of his designs: the civil war which he so rashly undertook against Licinius employed all his attention; and the defeat and death of Maximin soon delivered the church from the last and most implacable of her enemies[2].

In this general view of the persecution which was first authorised by the edicts of Diocletian, I have purposely refrained from describing the particular sufferings and deaths of the christian martyrs. It would have been an easy task, from the history of Eusebius, from the declamations of Lactantius, and from the most ancient acts, to collect a long series of horrid and disgustful pictures, and to fill many pages with racks and scourges, with iron hooks and red hot beds, and with all the variety of tortures which fire and steel, savage beasts and more savage executioners, could in-

  1. See Eusebius, 1. viii. c. 14. 1. ix. c. 2—8; Lactantius de M. P. c. 36. These writers agree in representing the arts of Maximin; but the former relates the execution of several martyrs, while the latter expressly affirms, occidi servos Dei vetuit.
  2. A few days before his death, he published a very ample edict of toleration, in which he imputes all the severities which the christians suffered to the judges and governors, who had misunderstood his intentions. See the edict in Eusebius, 1. ix. c. 10.