(?ONTBNT?. 21 Doclaretmn of Leo X. 406 Decree of the Oouncil of Trent 407 port the doctri? 407 1. They make it an article of faith 407 2. The authority of the Councit of Trent 407 3. Their Scripture authority 44)T 4. Ecclesiastical usage not for them 407 They.came in the place of the ancient canomcal penance? and followed the abrogation of the prim?.'tive discipline 408 Moshetm cited 4?8, 409 The foundation of them was !aid by Clement �I., A.D. 1250 409 Ill. $1?m?* ofi?u? 410 i. Romanists eedeavour to keep out of sight their real character 410 2. Form of ono quoted by Kobertson, as umed by Tetzei 410-412 'l?nis is no ezaggeration of the? doctrine 412 .Nor abus? of it 412 'l?.elr real doctrine the same 412 3. Such indulgences as have been an- hulled 412, 413 4. Those granted to certain orders 413, 414 Form of one 414, 415 5. Thoso granted to all the faithful 415 M..ny instances given 415-417 Specimen in full by Benedict XIV. 417, 418 6. Indulgences of recent date 418 Form of one, dated May 14th, 1809 419, 420 IV. How tacit aFpiy to t/? dead 420, 421 V. TAg ju?e? 4?i 1. The jubilee among the Jew-, 421 g. Its fn'st institution in the Church of Rome 421 3. The jubilee in 1825 422 VI. Evil r,o?equoaces of im?dgenc? 422 I The con?i.'tions on which they are granted, m a strong argument a?ainst them 422 2. uncertainty, danger, and decep- tion of them 422-424 3 They. o?rate as a commission to cornnut sm 424 The indulgence properly propo- sea to remit sin; and not its temporal guilt merely, as their divines say 424, 425 The Protestant doctmm not chargeable with the same di?. 6culty 425 4. Indulgences suppose sentiments and feelings averse to pure reli- ?no 425, 428 $ sale of them operates as an ?m?mrp, geme? to commit sin 428 6. It is even a l?,m? to ?n ?42?77 Thb proved by facts The tu book refem?l to 427 7. They are employed by the Church of Rome to obtain money 427, 428 CHAPTER XIV. EX?ItBMB UNC?ION 428 I. 8ta, tement of tAe ? 428 '1. Council of Florence quoted 428, 429 ?. Council of Trent cited 429, 430 Uncertainty connoted with their 430, 431 431, 432 4,92 432-434 434 434 4415 435 8. It tends to produce strange views and feelings in dying Christians 449, 444 9. It is chargeaiSle with many surditiee and inconsistencies It is absurd in its institution ?-?-?-, 44.5 Is contreo] to several doctrines of the Church of Rome 445 10. It is the means of extortion by the clergy 445, 446 Some ve 11. g?rat ;;? Romanlets allow it is not tau Jm 446 1 views IIL T/? ma?r ofi? IV. form o/it V. It, I. S?cti? ?ce 2. 8?en? ?ce 3. It cle? ?m s? 5. Heath of?y 6. ?v?e?s ? the de? VII. 0? q?i?t e? ?- ? ? a ?? ?7 ,1. I? matter a? fo? ? u?u? 2. It ? ?emnt from that men?n? ? St. Ja?s v, 14. 15 3. ?e eff?s ? to it exist 4. Not sup?n? ? J? ?ven s?en? to pm? 5. ?e ?m?h ? ?ptuml in? ?er mate?ily 6. ?e test?ony o? ?tiquity is (1.) ?e unction of the ?e?nt from extreme unc?on (2.) The e?y fathem do ?t menti? it (30 ?or th? of the f? tint six centun? ?1, 7. It ?ts ?ju?ously th? w? ceive it ?2,
�
