Page:Discovery and Decipherment of the Trilingual Cuneiform Inscriptions.djvu/162

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
MODERN DISCOVERY
133

The place was visited in 1810 by Captains Kinneir and Monteith, who were attached to the mission of Sir John Malcolm.[1] The former describes the ruins as lying about seven or eight miles to the west of Dizful and not unlike those of Babylon. He describes it as consisting of a succession of mounds covered with fragments of bricks and coloured tiles extending over nearly twelve miles. Two mounds attracted special attention. The first rises to a height of a hundred feet and is about a mile in circumference. At its base is the reputed Tomb of Daniel, a building that appeal's comparatively modern. The other mound is not quite so high, but it is nearly two miles in circumference. They are composed of a mixture of brick and clay, with irregular layers of brick and mortar five or six feet thick to serve as a prop. Large blocks of marble covered with hieroglyphics were reported to be occasionally discovered by the Arabs.[2] One of these—the famous 'black stone'—was seen by Captain Monteith near the Tomb of Daniel, where it had recently been rolled down from the summit of the Citadel Hill. It was not more than twenty-two inches long and twelve broad, but it had a cuneiform inscription on one side, and various sacred emblems represented upon the other. He made a sketch of it and might then have purchased it at a moderate price; but, though not large, it was found impossible at that time to remove it. Shortly afterwards two other Englishmen—the unfortunate Grant and Fotheringham—offered seventy pounds for it, but their intention to take it with them on their return was frustrated by their murder.[3] The value set

  1. Kinneir, p. 92.
  2. Ib. p. 100.
  3. W. K. Loftus, Chaldæa and Susiana atia (1857), pp. 417-19. A sketch of the stone may be seen in Walpole's Travels in Turkey, ii. 426, and is reproduced in Loftus, p.419.