Page:Discovery and Decipherment of the Trilingual Cuneiform Inscriptions.djvu/98

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
MODERN DISCOVERY
69

ground, and to right and left were four tombs each six feet long.[1]

The general impression left upon his mind by the contemplation of Persepolis was that the ruins were the most magnificent he had ever seen.[2] Although not without fault, they are, taken as a whole, characterised by excellent taste and worthy of admiration for the amount of labour that lies concealed as well as for that which is displayed. He attributed the destruction of the building more to the religious zeal of the Mohamedans than to time. Istakhr early became the seat of a Viceroy of the Khalifs, and since then the work of demolition has never ceased. Even Shah Abbas adorned his palace at Ispahan with some of its marbles, and others found their way to Shiraz. Not long before Chardin's visit the governor of that place gave orders that sixty men should be employed in systematic destruction directed chiefly against the human figures; but fortunately his orders were not fully carried into execution.

The year after the appearance of Chardin's account of Persepolis Engelbert Kaempfer published his Travels, (1712) which include a description of the same monument.[3] He was a German physician who went to Persia in 1684 in the capacity of secretary to the Swedish Envoy, and he subsequently remained as surgeon to the Dutch fleet stationed in the Persian Gulf. His visit to Persepolis occurred twelve years later than that of Chardin, but unfortunately he was not accompanied by a skilful artist (1686). He treats us to five drawings of Persepolis and three of Naksh-i-Rustam. The former include two general views of the Platform, one taken from the west and the other from the east: the Porch,

  1. Ib. pp.343, 347-351.
  2. Ib. p. 385.
  3. Amoenitates Eroticae, by Engelbert Kaempfer (1712), 297-353.