Page:EB1911 - Volume 16.djvu/898

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
876
LOGARITHM


of the one above it. To construct this table Briggs, using about thirty places of decimals, extracted the square root of 10 fifty-four times, and thus found that the logarithm of 1.00000 00000 00000 12781 91493 20032 35 was 0.00000 00000 00000 05551 11512 31257 82702, and that for numbers of this form (i.e. for numbers beginning with 1 followed by fifteen ciphers, and then by seventeen or a less number of significant figures) the logarithms were proportional to these significant figures. He then by means of a simple proportion deduced that log (1.00000 00000 00000 1) = 0.00000 00000 00000 04342 94481 90325 1804, so that, a quantity 1.00000 00000 00000 x (where x consists of not more than seventeen figures) having been obtained by repeated extraction of the square root of a given number, the logarithm of 1.00000 00000 00000 x could then be found by multiplying x by .00000 00000 00000 04342....

To find the logarithm of 2, Briggs raised it to the tenth power, viz. 1024, and extracted the square root of 1.024 forty-seven times, the result being 1.00000 00000 00000 16851 60570 53949 77. Multiplying the significant figures by 4342 ... he obtained the logarithm of this quantity, viz. 0.00000 00000 00000 07318 55936 90623 9336, which multiplied by 247 gave 0.01029 99566 39811 95265 277444, the logarithm of 1.024, true to 17 or 18 places. Adding the characteristic 3, and dividing by 10, he found (since 2 is the tenth root of 1024) log 2 = .30102 99956 63981 195. Briggs calculated in a similar manner log 6, and thence deduced log 3.

It will be observed that in the first process the value of the modulus is in fact calculated from the formula.

h = 1 ,
10h − 1 loge 10

the value of h being 1/254, and in the second process log10 2 is in effect calculated from the formula.

log10 2 = ( 210/247 − 1 ) × 1 × 247 .
loge 10 10

Briggs also gave methods of forming the mean proportionals or square roots by differences; and the general method of constructing logarithmic tables by means of differences is due to him.

The following calculation of log 5 is given as an example of the application of a method of mean proportionals. The process consists in taking the geometric mean of numbers above and below 5, the object being to at length arrive at 5.000000. To every geometric mean in the column of numbers there corresponds the arithmetical mean in the column of logarithms. The numbers are denoted by A, B, C, &c., in order to indicate their mode of formation.

    Numbers.  Logarithms.
A =   1.000000  0.0000000
B =   10.000000  1.0000000
C = √(AB) = 3.162277  0.5000000
D = √(BC) = 5.623413  0.7500000
E = √(CD) = 4.216964  0.6250000
F = √(DE) = 4.869674  0.6875000
G = √(DF) = 5.232991  0.7187500
H = √(FG) = 5.048065  0.7031250
I =√(FH) = 4.958069  0.6953125
K = √(HI) = 5.002865  0.6992187
L =√(IK) = 4.980416  0.6972656
M = √(KL) = 4.991627  0.6982421
N = √(KM) = 4.997242  0.6987304
O = √(KN) = 5.000052  0.6989745
P = √(NO) = 4.998647  0.6988525
Q = √(OP) = 4.999350  0.6989135
R = √(OQ) = 4.999701  0.6989440
S = √(OR) = 4.999876  0.6989592
T = √(OS) = 4.999963  0.6989668
V = √(OT) = 5.000008  0.6989707
W =√(TV) = 4.999984  0.6989687
X = √(WV) = 4.999997  0.6989697
Y = √(VX) = 5.000003  0.6989702
Z = √(XY) = 5.000000  0.6989700

Great attention was devoted to the methods of calculating logarithms during the 17th and 18th centuries. The earlier methods proposed were, like those of Briggs, purely arithmetical, and for a long time logarithms were regarded from the point of view indicated by their name, that is to say, as depending on the theory of compounded ratios. The introduction of infinite series into mathematics effected a great change in the modes of calculation and the treatment of the subject. Besides Napier and Briggs, special reference should be made to Kepler (Chilias, 1624) and Mercator (Logarithmotechnia, 1668), whose methods were arithmetical, and to Newton, Gregory, Halley and Cotes, who employed series. A full and valuable account of these methods is given in Hutton’s “Construction of Logarithms,” which occurs in the introduction to the early editions of his Mathematical Tables, and also forms tract 21 of his Mathematical Tracts (vol. i., 1812). Many of the early works on logarithms were reprinted in the Scriptores logarithmici of Baron Maseres already referred to.

In the following account only those formulae and methods will be referred to which would now be used in the calculation of logarithms.

Since

loge (1 + x) = x1/2x2 + 1/3x31/4x4 + &c.,

we have, by changing the sign of x,

loge (1 − x) = −x − 1/2x21/3x31/4x4 − &c.;

whence

loge 1 + x = 2 (x + 1/3x3 + 1/5x5 + &c.),
1 − x

and, therefore, replacing x by (pq)/(p + q),

loge p = 2 { pq + 1/3 ( pq ) 3 + 1/5 ( pq ) 5 + &c. },
q p + q p + q p + q

in which the series is always convergent, so that the formula affords a method of deducing the logarithm of one number from that of another.

As particular cases we have, by putting q = 1,

loge p = 2 { p − 1 + 1/3 ( p − 1 ) 3 + 1/5 ( p − 1 ) 5 + &c. },
p + 1 p + 1 p + 1

and by putting q = p + 1,

loge(p + 1) − loge p = 2 { 1 + 1/3 1 + 1/5 1 + &c. };
2p + 1 (2p + 1)3 (2p + 1)5

the former of these equations gives a convergent series for logep, and the latter a very convergent series by means of which the logarithm of any number may be deduced from the logarithm of the preceding number.

From the formula for loge (p/q) we may deduce the following very convergent series for loge2, loge3 and loge5, viz.:—

loge 2 = 2 (7P  + 5Q  + 3R), loge 3 = 2 (11P + 8Q  + 5R), loge 5 = 2 (16P + 12Q + 7R),

where

P = 1 + 1/3 · 1 + 1/5 · 1 + &c.
31 (31)3 (31)5
Q = 1 + 1/3 · 1 + 1/5 · 1 + &c.
49 (49)3 (49)5
R = 1 + 1/3 · 1 + 1/5 · 1 + &c.
161 (161)3 (161)5

The following still more convenient formulae for the calculation of loge 2, loge 3, &c. were given by J. Couch Adams in the Proc. Roy. Soc., 1878, 27, p. 91. If

a = log 10 = −log ( 1 − 1 ), b = log 25 = −log ( 1 − 4 ),
9 10 24 100
c = log 81 = log ( 1 + 1 ),   d = log 50 = −log ( 1 − 2 ),
80 80 49 100
e = log 126 = log ( 1 + 8 ),
125 1000

then

log 2 = 7a − 2b + 3c, log 3 = 11a − 3b + 5c, log 5 = 16a − 4b + 7c,

and

log 7 = 1/2 (39a − 10b + 17cd) or = 19a − 4b + 8c + e,

and we have the equation of condition,

a − 2b + c = d + 2e.

By means of these formulae Adams calculated the values of loge 2, loge 3, loge 5, and loge 7 to 276 places of decimals, and deduced the value of loge 10 and its reciprocal M, the modulus of the Briggian system of logarithms. The value of the modulus found by Adams is

Mo = 0.43429 44819 03251 82765 11289
18916 60508 22943 97005 80366
65661 14453 78316 58646 49208
87077 47292 24949 33843 17483
18706 10674 47663 03733 64167
92871 58963 90656 92210 64662
81226 58521 27086 56867 03295
93370 86965 88266 88331 16360
77384 90514 28443 48666 76864
65860 85135 56148 21234 87653
43543 43573 17253 83562 21868
25        

which is true certainly to 272, and probably to 273, places (Proc. Roy. Soc., 1886, 42, p. 22, where also the values of the other logarithms are given).

If the logarithms are to be Briggian all the series in the preceding formulae must be multiplied by M, the modulus; thus,

log10 (1 + x) = M (x1/2x2 + 1/3x31/4x4 + &c.),

and so on.

As has been stated, Abraham Sharp’s table contains 61-decimal