Page:EB1911 - Volume 17.djvu/383

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
368
MAGNETISM, TERRESTRIAL
  


The minima, or extreme easterly positions in the waves, lie midway between successive maxima. All four terms, it will be seen, have maxima at some hour between 0h. 30m. and 2h. 30m. p.m. They thus reinforce one another strongly from 1 to 2 p.m., accounting for the prominence of the maximum in the early afternoon.

(From Phil. Trans.)
Fig. 8.

The utility of a Fourier analysis depends largely on whether the several terms have a definite physical significance. If the 24-hour and 12-hour terms, for instance, represent the action of forces whose distribution over the earth or whose seasonal variation is essentially different, then the analysis helps to distinguish these forces, and may assist in their being tracked to their ultimate source. Suppose, for example, one had reason to think the magnetic diurnal variation due to some meteorological phenomenon, e.g. heating of the earth’s atmosphere, then a comparison of Fourier coefficients, if such existed, for the two sets of phenomena would be a powerful method of investigation.

Table XVII.—Amplitudes and Phase Angles for Diurnal Inequality of Declination.

Place. Epoch. c1. c2. c3. c4. α1. α2. α3. α4.
     ° ° ° °
 Fort Rae (all)  1882–1883  18.49  8.22 1.99 2.07 156.5  41.9 308 104
 Fort Rae (quiet) 9.09 4.51 1.32 0.73 166.5  37.5 225 350
 Ekatarinburg 1841–1862 2.57 1.81 0.73 0.22 223.3  7.4 204 351
 Potsdam 1890–1899 2.81 1.90 0.83 0.31 239.9  32.6 237  49
 Kew (ordinary) 1890–1900 2.91 1.79 0.79 0.27 234.0  39.7 239  57
 Kew (quiet) 2.37 1.82 0.90 0.30 227.3  42.1 240  55
 Falmouth (quiet) 1891–1902 2.18 1.82 0.91 0.29 226.2  40.5 238  56
 Parc St Maur 1883–1899 2.70 1.87 0.85 0.30 238.6  32.5 235  95
 Toronto 1842–1848 2.65 2.34 1.00 0.33 213.7  34.9 238 350
 Washington 1840–1842 2.38 1.86 0.65 0.33 223.0  26.6 223  53
 Manila 1890–1900 0.53 0.58 0.43 0.17 266.3  50.7 226  89
 Trivandrum 1853–1864 0.54 0.46 0.29 0.10 289.0  49.6   114
 Batavia 1883–1899 0.80 0.88 0.43 0.13 332.0 163.2  5 236
 St. Helena 1842–1847 0.68 0.61 0.63 0.34 275.8 171.4  27 244
 Mauritius 1876–1890 0.86 1.11 0.76 0.22  21.6 172.7 350 161
 C. of G. Hope 1841–1846 1.15 1.13 0.80 0.35 287.7 156.0 351 193
 Melbourne 1858–1863 2.52 2.45 1.23 0.35  27.4 176.7  9 193
 Hobart 1841–1848 2.29 2.15 0.87 0.32  33.6 170.8 349 185
 S. Georgia 1882–1883 2.13 1.28 0.76 0.31  30.3 185.3  7 180
 Victoria Land (all) 1902–1903 20.51  4.81 1.21 1.32 158.7 306.9 292 303
 Victoria Land (quieter)  15.34  4.05 1.24 1.18 163.8 312.9 261  

§ 21. Fourier coefficients of course often vary much with the season of the year. In the case of the declination this is especially true of the phase angles at tropical stations. To enter on details for a number of stations would unduly occupy space. A fair idea of the variability in the case of declination in temperate latitudes may be derived from Table XVIII., which gives monthly values for Kew derived from ordinary days of an 11-year period 1890–1900.

Fourier analysis has been applied to the diurnal inequalities of the other magnetic elements, but more sparingly. Such results are illustrated by Table XIX., which contains data derived from quiet days at Kew from 1890 to 1900. Winter includes November to February, Summer May to August, and Equinox the remaining four months. In this case the data are derived from mean diurnal inequalities for the season specified. In the case of the c or amplitude coefficients the unit is 1′ for I (inclination), and 1γ for H and V (horizontal and vertical force). At Kew the seasonal variation in the amplitude is fairly similar for all the elements. The 24-hour and 12–hour terms tend to be largest near midsummer, and least near midwinter; but the 8-hour and 6-hour terms have two well-marked maxima near the equinoxes, and a clearly marked minimum near midsummer, in addition to one near midwinter. On the other hand, the phase angle phenomena vary much for the different elements. The 24-hour term, for instance, has its maximum earlier in winter than in summer in the case of the declination and vertical force, but the exact reverse holds for the inclination and the horizontal force.

Table XVIII.—Kew Declination: Amplitudes and Phase Angles
(local mean time).

Month. c1. c2. c3. c4. α1. α2. α3. α4.
   ° ° ° °
 January 1.79 0.86 0.41 0.27 251.2 29.8 254 64
 February 2.41 1.11 0.57 0.30 242.0 27.7 235 39
 March 3.05 1.98 1.11 0.45 233.2 36.1 223 49
 April 3.35 2.48 1.17 0.39 224.8 39.2 228 61
 May 3.57 2.38 0.87 0.17 221.3 50.8 245 89
 June 3.83 2.39 0.74 0.05 212.6 46.7 239 72
 July 3.72 2.30 0.77 0.11 214.6 48.1 233  8
 August 3.64 2.43 1.05 0.18 228.2 57.2 244 51
 September  3.35 2.02 1.04 0.35 236.9 55.3 245 70
 October 2.69 1.69 0.92 0.48 240.1 35.6 235 65
 November 1.94 1.06 0.51 0.32 248.3 28.3 247 61
 December 1.61 0.81 0.35 0.20 255.1 22.0 243 56

§ 22. If secular change proceeded uniformly throughout the year, the value En of any element at the middle of the nth month of the year would be connected with E, the mean value for the whole year, by the formula En = E + (2n − 13)s/24, where s is the secular change per annum. For the present Annual Inequality.purpose, difference in the lengths of the months may be neglected. If one applies to EnE the correction −(2n − 13)s/24 one eliminates a regularly progressive secular change; what remains is known as the annual inequality. If only a short period of years is dealt with, irregularities in the secular change from year to year, or errors of observation, may obviously simulate the effect of a real annual inequality. Even when a long series of years is included, there is always a possibility of a spurious inequality arising from annual variation in the instruments, or from annual change in the conditions of observation. J. Liznar,[1] from a study of data from a number of stations, arrived at certain mean results for the annual inequalities in declination and inclination in the northern and southern hemispheres, and J. Hann[2] has more recently dealt with Liznar’s and newer results. Table XX. gives a variety of data, including the mean results given by Liznar and Hann. In the case of declination + denotes westerly position; in the case of inclination it denotes a larger dip (whether the inclination be north or south). According to Liznar declination in summer is to the west of the normal position in both hemispheres. The phenomena, however, at Parc St Maur are, it will be seen, the exact opposite of what Liznar regards as normal; and whilst the Potsdam results resemble his mean in type, the range of the inequality there, as at Parc St Maur, is relatively small. Of the three sets of data given for Kew the first two are derived in a similar way to those for other stations; the first set are based on quiet days only, the second on all but highly disturbed days. Both these sets of results are fairly similar in type to the Parc St Maur results, but give larger ranges; they are thus even more opposed to Liznar’s normal type. The last set of data for Kew is of a special kind. During the 11 years 1890 to 1900 the Kew declination magnetograph showed to within 1′ the exact secular change as derived from the absolute observations; also, if any annual variation existed in the position of the base lines of the curves it was exceedingly small. Thus the accumulation of the daily non-cyclic changes shown by the curves should closely represent the combined effects of secular change and annual inequality. Eliminating the secular change, we arrive at an annual inequality, based on all days of the year including the highly disturbed. It is this annual inequality which appears under the heading s. It is certainly very unlike the annual inequality derived in the usual way. Whether the difference is to be wholly assigned to the fact that highly disturbed days contribute in the one case, but not in the other, is a question for future research.

Table XIX.—Kew Diurnal Inequality: Amplitudes and Phase
Angles (local mean time).

  c1. c2. c3. c4. α1. α2. α3. α4.
          ° ° ° °
I Winter  0.240  0.222  0.104  0.076 250.0  91.8 344 194
Equinox  0.601  0.290  0.213  0.127 290.3 135.5  4 207
Summer   0.801  0.322  0.172  0.070 312.5 155.5  39 238
                 
H  Winter 3.62 3.86 1.81 1.13  82.9 277.3 154  6
Equinox 10.97  5.87 3.32 1.84 109.6 303.5 167  16
Summer 14.85  6.23 2.35 0.95 130.3 316.5 199  41
                 
V  Winter 2.46 1.67 0.86 0.42 153.9 300.8 108 280
Equinox 6.15 4.70 2.51 0.94 117.2 272.3  99 289
Summer 8.63 6.45 2.24 0.55 122.0 272.4 100 285


  1. M.Z. 1888, 5, p. 225.
  2. M.Z. 1904, 21, p. 129.