Page:EB1922 - Volume 32.djvu/449

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
SHIP AND SHIPBUILDING
429


Even in 1921 there was a great need for more British floating docks of the largest description. This was more especially apparent on the Clyde, where there was no dock, either floating or graving, which could take capital ships.

The German ships were not handicapped in this way, and most of their later capital ships had widths of between 90 and 100 ft., which enabled them to carry more armour, and as far as it is possible to judge, they stood a good deal of battering without showing any lack of stability, while they proved to be good gun platforms, at any rate for work in the North Sea.

Immediately after war was declared great pressure was exercised to complete the ships then building for the British navy, and to order such other vessels as could be designed and finished in the shortest possible time. The view held in the early days that the war would only last a year necessarily coloured all that was done in the way of naval design and construction. Generally speaking, therefore, the construction of new battleships was ruled out. With the acquisition of the" Agincourt,"" Erin "and " Canada," which were building in England for foreign Governments in private yards, and in view of the certain early completion of the remaining two vessels of the " Iron Duke" class, shortly to be followed by the vessels of the " Queen Elizabeth " class, Great Britain had a great preponderance of heavier capital ships, or Dreadnoughts, over the enemy; and as this class of ship takes longer to design and construct than any other, it was obviously a prudent course to concentrate on such types as were specially needed and could be built more quickly.

It should also be remembered that the menace of the submarine, which was from the first beginning to loom as a vital factor in the war, pointed in the direction of large numbers of patrol boats, torpedo-boat destroyers, and smaller types of vessels to deal with this menace. No time, therefore, was lost in placing orders for additional British destroyers, submarines, light cruisers, sloops, mine-sweepers, patrol boats, etc.; and it very soon became clear that the Royal dockyards and the regular warship- building contractors would not be able to cope with the mass of new construction that was required. Accordingly, orders for many of the last-named classes were placed with builders who had hitherto only been accustomed to mercantile work. With the arrangements that were made, however, for superintending and overseeing the work by the Admiralty, with the assistance of the registration societies Lloyd's and the British Corporation

very little difficulty was experienced in getting the work satisfactorily carried out by the firms new to this class of shipbuilding, and success attended the arrangements made.

Table II. gives the number and tonnage of vessels added to the British navy during the war. The total number (including other classes besides those in the table) was 1,513, of approximately 2,356,000 tons displacement.

TABLE II. British Warships Completed and Lost Between Aug. 4 1914 and Nov. II 1918.

Completions Losses
No. Approx. Displacement No. Approx. Displacement
Battleships 15 395,ooo 13 201,000
Battle cruisers 3 81,500 3 63,000
Cruisers 3 56,500 13 158,500
Light cruisers .... 36 143,000 12 46,000
Monitors 40 126,000 6 14,000
Aircraft-carriers .... 8 67,500 3 27,500
Flotilla leaders .... 28 45,500 3 5,000
Torpedo-boat destroyers . 255 273,000 64 52,000
Submarines 146 151-500 54 43,500
P. and P. C. boats 63 40,000 2 1,000
Sloops 124 155,500 18 22,500
Paddle mine-sweepers . 34 27,500
Twin screw mine-sweepers . 55 43,000
Patrol gunboats .... 3 27,000
Oilers and petrol carriers . 67 436,000
Whalers, trawlers and drifters . 382 173.500

Battleships. To take ships added to the British navy during the war in the proper order, it is necessary to begin with battleships of the " Iron Duke " class. The particulars of Dreadnoughts built after the " Hercules " are given in Table III.

The " Iron Duke " class (see fig. i), of which there were four, followed the " King George V." class, both in sequence of time and in general characteristics. The same main armament, similarly arranged, with the five turrets all on the centre line of the ship, was adhered to, the chief difference in the " Iron Dukes " being that instead of the 4-in. guns forming the secondary armament, a battery of 12 6-in. guns protected by 6-in. armour was finally decided upon. The protection also was somewhat increased over that of the " King George V.," involving an increase in dimensions over any previous British battleships. Two of the class were laid down in Jan. 1912 and two in May, the four vessels being completed ,in March, June, Oct. and Nov. 1914, so that two were ready just

TABLE III. Particulars of British Battleships.

Vessel Date of Launch Length between perpendiculars; (length over all) Breadth Mean Draught Load Displacement: Tons Speed: Knots HorsePower Armament Thickest side of Armour
" Orion " 1910
"Thunderer" 1911 545 ft. (581 ft.) 88 ft. 6 in. 27 ft. 6 in. 22,500 21 27,000 10 13'5-in.
16 4-in.
32½-in. T. T.
12 in.
"Conqueror" 1911
" Monarch " 1911
" King George V." 1911
" Centurion " 1911 555ft- (597ft.6in.) 89ft. 27 ft. 6 in. 23,000 21 27,000 10 13'5-in-
16 4-in.
32 1 -in. T. T.
12 in.
"Ajax" 1912
" Audacious " 1912
" Iron Duke " 1912
" Marlborough ". 1912 580 ft. (622 ft. 9 in.) 90 ft. 28ft. 25,000 21 29,000 10 13'5-in.
12 6-m.
42 1 -in. T. T.
12 in.
" Emperor of India". 1913
" Benbow " . 1913
" Queen Elizabeth". 1913
" Warspite " 1913
" Barham " 1914 600ft. (643ft.9in.) 90 ft. 6 in. 28 ft. 9 in. 27,500 25 75,000 8 is-in.
12 6-in.
42i-in. T. T.
13 in.
"Valiant " . 1914
"Malaya " . 1915
" Royal Sovereign ". 1915
" Royal Oak " . 1914
" Revenge ". 1915 580 ft. (624ft-3in.) 88 ft. 6 in.
102 ft. with bulge.
28 ft. 6 in. 25,750 23 40,000 8 15-in.
14 6-in.
42 1 -in. T. T.
13 in.
" Resolution " 1915
" Ramillies " 1916
" Agincourt " 1913 632ft. (67ift.6in.) 89 ft. 27 ft. 27,500 . 22 34,000 14 12-in.20 6-in
32i-in. T. T.
9 in.
" Erin " 1913 525 ft. (559 ft. 6 in.) 91 ft. 7 in. 28 ft. 6 in. 23,000 21 26,000 10-13-5-in. 16-6-in
42i-in. T. T.
12 in.
"Canada". 1913 625 ft. (661 ft.) 92 ft. 28 ft. 6 in. 28,000 22¾ 37,000 10 14-in.i6 6-in
42l-in. T. T.
9 in.