Page:Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr.pdf/7

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 7 of 58

(d) Among the pensioners also, the above anomaly will prevail as pointed out in Janaki Prasad.
Janaki Prasad Parimoo v. State of J & K, (1973) 1 SCC 420

2(c). Citation inserted in case-history where only the title and year of the impugned/earlier orders are given.

For example,
From the Judgment and Order dated June 17, 1980 of Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Application No. 2711 of 1999: AIR 1981
Guj 15

3. SCC style of presenting (repeatedly) cited cases

For example,

Changes have been made in the name of the cited cases as per SCC style as “Rattan Singh’s case (supra)”; “Mohammad’s case (supra)” and “Range Forest Officer’s case” in the raw text consecutively changed to “Ratan Singh case”; “Mohammed case and “Range Forest Officer case” in SCC.

Raw text obtained from Registry:

SCC Page:
In Rattan Singh’s case (supra), the High Court of Madhya Pradesh finding certain illegalities in the prosecution relating to setting aside

In Mohammad’s case (supra), the observation of the Kerela High Court that “if a clear illegality or injustice comes to the notice of the High Court

In the third case relied on by Justice M.K. Chawla, namely, Range Forest Officer’s case, a vehicle belonging to the respondent was confiscated.

140. In Ratan Singh case the High Court of Madhya Pradesh finding certain illegalities